;-)
Hey James,
Why don't you join All BASIC and hang out with AIR and I. We be talking
IUP jargon. ;-)
John
On Sun, 2015-12-13 at 20:38 -0200, Antonio Scuri wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> No drawbacks. For instance IupLabel() calls IupCreate(), so all
> controls are already created in this way.
>
>
>
Hi,
No drawbacks. For instance IupLabel() calls IupCreate(), so all controls
are already created in this way.
Best,
Scuri
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 9:03 AM, James Fuller wrote:
> Antonio,
> I don't know where I got the original code (FreeBasic?) but are there
> any drawbacks using this Creat
Hi Victor,
Yes, I know.
I'm not sure if we should abandon mingw.org. But we are considering
changes in the Windows distribution for IUP 4.0. Thanks for the feedback.
Best,
Scuri
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Victor Bombi wrote:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> I am not sure if you know that mingw-w6
Hi Antonio,
I am not sure if you know that mingw-w64 can be used to build 32 bits binaries.
It is better than original mingw that is a bit outdated.
I have never been able to use your 32bit binaries because all my compilation is
done with mingw-w64 and there is dll collision.
Best
victor bombi
Antonio,
I don't know where I got the original code (FreeBasic?) but are there any
drawbacks using this Create/AddChild approach with IUP. In other words are
there IUP items that cannot be created in this manner?
http://www.bcxbasic.com/smf/index.php?topic=922.0
James
--
