Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a FAQ, but I searched the Wiki and couldn't answer
this question. Right now ivtv is developed separately from the mainline
kernel. Are there any plans (and ETAs) for merging it in mainline ?
My past experience with out-of-tree drivers have been
Hi,
See http://ivtvdriver.org/trac/roadmap:
The final goal is to make the driver part of the kernel. These means that
it must be accepted into the V4L2 repository. However, massive cleanups
are required to get it into a state suitable for inclusion into the
kernel.
Hans Verkuil and others
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a FAQ, but I searched the Wiki and couldn't answer
this question. Right now ivtv is developed separately from the mainline
kernel. Are there any plans (and ETAs) for merging it in mainline ?
My
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:36 -0500, Micah F. Galizia wrote:
I have been using the ivtv drivers with MythTV for over a year now, and
the only glitch I ever had was addressed and fixed in two days by one of
the developers. So, regardless of in or out of tree development, I'd
say your efforts
Rudy and Stanley, thanks for the info
I'm reassured now - I'll buy a PVR 150 and help with bug reports (if
nothing else).
This is crucial info for users - some projects stay out-of-tree because
they like it this way. Maybe a line about 0.5 goals on the front page
would help. I couldn't find this
Was this spam, or flamebait ;-)). I guess both.
Thanks to all the ivtv drivers developers!
___
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
Le mardi 01 novembre 2005 à 08:18 -0600, A. P. Kennedy a écrit :
Was this spam, or flamebait ;-)). I guess both.
And how do you call this sentence please ? I barely refrained from
responding in kind.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement
