Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a FAQ, but I searched the Wiki and couldn't answer
this question. Right now ivtv is developed separately from the mainline
kernel. Are there any plans (and ETAs) for merging it in mainline ?
My past experience with out-of-tree drivers have been
Hi,
See http://ivtvdriver.org/trac/roadmap:
The final goal is to make the driver part of the kernel. These means that
it must be accepted into the V4L2 repository. However, massive cleanups
are required to get it into a state suitable for inclusion into the
kernel.
Hans Verkuil and others
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Hi,
I'm sorry if this is a FAQ, but I searched the Wiki and couldn't answer
this question. Right now ivtv is developed separately from the mainline
kernel. Are there any plans (and ETAs) for merging it in mainline ?
My
On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 08:36 -0500, Micah F. Galizia wrote:
I have been using the ivtv drivers with MythTV for over a year now, and
the only glitch I ever had was addressed and fixed in two days by one of
the developers. So, regardless of in or out of tree development, I'd
say your efforts
Rudy and Stanley, thanks for the info
I'm reassured now - I'll buy a PVR 150 and help with bug reports (if
nothing else).
This is crucial info for users - some projects stay out-of-tree because
they like it this way. Maybe a line about 0.5 goals on the front page
would help. I couldn't find this
Was this spam, or flamebait ;-)). I guess both.
Thanks to all the ivtv drivers developers!
___
ivtv-devel mailing list
ivtv-devel@ivtvdriver.org
http://ivtvdriver.org/mailman/listinfo/ivtv-devel
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:41, Christian Iversen wrote:
Can anybody help me here?
Hi all.
I have a brand new PVR500 (MCE) card. I have some questions in this regard.
Please, if you can answer even just one question, I would be very grateful
if you would take the time to answer me. If
Le mardi 01 novembre 2005 à 08:18 -0600, A. P. Kennedy a écrit :
Was this spam, or flamebait ;-)). I guess both.
And how do you call this sentence please ? I barely refrained from
responding in kind.
--
Nicolas Mailhot
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:39:55PM +0100, Christian Iversen wrote:
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:41, Christian Iversen wrote:
Can anybody help me here?
well, drawing upon my 8 hours or so of experience with this card... :-)
(any idea why the PVR is on :02, when _everything_ else is on
On Sunday 30 October 2005 22:41, Christian Iversen wrote:
Hi all.
I have a brand new PVR500 (MCE) card. I have some questions in this
regard. Please, if you can answer even just one question, I would be
very grateful if you would take the time to answer me. If something
isn't completely
Hi,After several days of trying, I am totally and utterly unable to figure out how to work the new hotplug-based firmware loading. I've put copies of the firmware files in a whole bunch of different locations (listed below). No matter what I try, I can't seem to get the hotplug firmware loader to
I have to apologize because I am committing a cardinal
sin by cross-posting this message I sent to the user
list just under a week ago. Please forgive me - I got
no responses on the list, you all seem so much more
knowlegeable over here, and I'm near my wit's end.
I have a PVR-250 and PVR-350 in
I compiled 0.4.0 against kernel 2.6.14 and when I boot, I get the
following messages. Don't know if they're important, other problems
prevented me from actually testing the driver. Should I turn off the
video4linux modules that come with the kernel. I had them on in the
2.4 series without all
I think this could be worded better. Just because it's a framebuffer doesn't
necessarily mean that there will be a large load on the CPU.
So something like :-
The X-driver for the PVR-350 support playback using Xv efficiently but does
not support any other 2d or 3d acceleration. For some
14 matches
Mail list logo
