Re: [ivtv-devel] [PAKEN]: what is in gvmvprx1.c, gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c, saa7115gv.c and tg5000tv.c?

2005-11-29 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Monday 28 November 2005 04:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In [EMAIL PROTECTED] message, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From earlier mails from T. Adachi and from reading the source I believe that gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c and tg5000tv.c are workarounds for incomplete tda9887 support (i.e. they

Re: [ivtv-devel] [PAKEN]: what is in gvmvprx1.c, gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c, saa7115gv.c and tg5000tv.c?

2005-11-27 Thread tadachi
In [EMAIL PROTECTED] message, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From earlier mails from T. Adachi and from reading the source I believe that gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c and tg5000tv.c are workarounds for incomplete tda9887 support (i.e. they all program a tda9887 I2C device). So tda9887.c must be

[ivtv-devel] [PAKEN]: what is in gvmvprx1.c, gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c, saa7115gv.c and tg5000tv.c?

2005-11-26 Thread Hans Verkuil
From earlier mails from T. Adachi and from reading the source I believe that gvmvprx2.c, mpg600gr.c and tg5000tv.c are workarounds for incomplete tda9887 support (i.e. they all program a tda9887 I2C device). So tda9887.c must be enhanced to support these changes. Is this correct? saa7115gv.c