Re: [ivtv-devel] 0.5 and backwards compatibility

2005-10-10 Thread Trev Jackson
Based on recent developments on v4l I think we should go with the initial idea: build v4l, then ivtv. In the meantime we keep 0.4 up to date with bug fixes and new features, at least for the duration of the 0.5 development series. Hans Hi Hans How can I help with 0.5 development?

Re: [ivtv-devel] 0.5 and backwards compatibility

2005-10-09 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sunday 09 October 2005 21:03, Trev Jackson wrote: On Sunday 09 Oct 2005 19:06, Hans Verkuil wrote: I've been thinking on how to handle compatibility with older kernels in the 0.5 series. The problem is that to stay backwards compatible requires keeping the supporting drivers (tuner,

Re: [ivtv-devel] 0.5 and backwards compatibility

2005-10-09 Thread Adam Forsyth
Well, for those of us who use FC4 and want to use the kernel from redhat (think quite a few people), it will be at least a month after 2.6.14 is released before we can upgrade, so your tester base is likely to shrink for a while. On 10/9/05, Tyler Trafford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hans Verkuil