Re: [Jabref-devel] Java 1.6

2009-05-11 Thread Morten Omholt Alver
2009/5/11 Christopher Oezbek : > Hi Morten, >  I think we do not need to store cookies past a JabRef session so a custom > implementation of the CookieHandler should be fine to use (maybe this one > http://java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2005/tt0913.html#1) Good idea - that seems to work. > >>

Re: [Jabref-devel] Java 1.6

2009-05-11 Thread Christopher Oezbek
Hi Morten, I think we do not need to store cookies past a JabRef session so a custom implementation of the CookieHandler should be fine to use (maybe this one http://java.sun.com/developer/JDCTechTips/2005/tt0913.html#1) > the plan is not to require 1.6. Since I use 1.6 normally, I tend not

Re: [Jabref-devel] Java 1.6

2009-05-11 Thread Morten Omholt Alver
Christopher, the plan is not to require 1.6. Since I use 1.6 normally, I tend not to notice when these 1.6 calls sneak in, but I'm planning to run it through a 1.5 compiler before making the next release. I don't know how we can address the CookieManager call, but the string stuff is of course eas

[Jabref-devel] Java 1.6

2009-05-11 Thread Christopher Oezbek
Hi Guys, is Java 1.6 now a requirement for JabRef? I see several errors because because the Eclipse set-up and the Ant-file still use 1.5 but the code uses String.isEmpty() and the CookieManager, which causes trouble. Greetings, Christopher --