Re: [java code coverage] Discuss Enhancement Request

2025-01-15 Thread Marc Hoffmann
I’m glad to hear that the XML report works for you. Thanks for the feedback, -marc > On 14. Jan 2025, at 15:38, 'Stuart Lewis' via JaCoCo and EclEmma Users > wrote: > > Hi Marc, Evgeny, > > Apologies for the late reply. I just wanted to thank you both for your > responses. We've been able to

Re: [java code coverage] Discuss Enhancement Request

2025-01-15 Thread 'Stuart Lewis' via JaCoCo and EclEmma Users
Hi Marc, Evgeny, Apologies for the late reply. I just wanted to thank you both for your responses. We've been able to move forwards with the machine readable XML report. Best Regards, Stuart On Tuesday, 17 December 2024 at 14:41:58 UTC Evgeny Mandrikov wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > In addition t

Re: [java code coverage] Discuss Enhancement Request

2024-12-17 Thread Evgeny Mandrikov
Hi Stuart, In addition to what Marc said, please also see https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/pull/488#issuecomment-316602731 Regards, Evgeny On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 15:21, Marc Hoffmann wrote: > Hi Stuart, > > thanks for your proposal and for discussing it here at the mailing list. > Some rand

Re: [java code coverage] Discuss Enhancement Request

2024-12-17 Thread Marc Hoffmann
Hi Stuart, thanks for your proposal and for discussing it here at the mailing list. Some random remarks and questions: We already have three reporting formats (HTML, XML, CSV), this would probably another reporting format in TXT format. I wonder what the exact format and content would be. We ha