Re: (x)APIC virtualization and vmx_handle_apic_access()

2017-09-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2017-09-01 20:08, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: > Hi. > > I'm already experimenting with this issue, in the way of trying to get > Zephyr + xAPIC good to go, besides x2APIC, but here goes the doubt in > order to confirm it. > > The function in the subject, which offloads work to

(x)APIC virtualization and vmx_handle_apic_access()

2017-09-01 Thread Gustavo Lima Chaves
Hi. I'm already experimenting with this issue, in the way of trying to get Zephyr + xAPIC good to go, besides x2APIC, but here goes the doubt in order to confirm it. The function in the subject, which offloads work to apic_mmio_access() and then to x86_mmio_parse(), has this last one parse the

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Henning Schild
Am Fri, 1 Sep 2017 16:40:09 +0300 schrieb Constantin Petra : > Hi Henning, > > Ok, I missed that. The "jailhouse" branch works, at least I see the > expected messages: > > [ 46.200693] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: using jailhouse mode > [ 46.206260] uio_ivshmem

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Constantin Petra
Hi Henning, Ok, I missed that. The "jailhouse" branch works, at least I see the expected messages: [ 46.200693] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: using jailhouse mode [ 46.206260] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: regular IRQs and /dev/uio0 & /dev/uio1 up Related to the patch on jailhouse-next, is that the

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Henning Schild
Am Fri, 1 Sep 2017 05:36:31 -0700 schrieb Constantin Petra : > Hi, > > I have a question related to this above driver implementation, in an > Ultrascale+ environment. > > This was taken from >

questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Constantin Petra
Hi, I have a question related to this above driver implementation, in an Ultrascale+ environment. This was taken from https://github.com/henning-schild/ivshmem-guest-code/blob/master/kernel_module/uio/uio_ivshmem.c, in an attempt to set up IVSHMEM connection (not ivshmem-net) with a different

Re: [PATCH v5] core, vmx: New MSR bitmap format, now a whitelist

2017-09-01 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2017-09-01 09:58, Henning Schild wrote: > Am Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:51:45 +0200 > schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : > >> On 2017-08-31 10:08, Andreas Rollbühler wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 31.08.2017 00:07, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: > + case MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE: > +   

Re: [PATCH v5] core, vmx: New MSR bitmap format, now a whitelist

2017-09-01 Thread Henning Schild
Am Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:51:45 +0200 schrieb "[ext] Jan Kiszka" : > On 2017-08-31 10:08, Andreas Rollbühler wrote: > > > > > > On 31.08.2017 00:07, Gustavo Lima Chaves wrote: > >>> + case MSR_IA32_MISC_ENABLE: > >>> + /* Allow 'Fast-Strings Enable' bit