Am Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:59:57 +0200
schrieb Ralf Ramsauer :
> Hi Lokesh,
>
> thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline
> discussions on that before.
>
> On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > Hi Lokesh
> >
> > On 2017-09-12 16:03,
On 2017-09-13 15:59, Ralf Ramsauer wrote:
> Hi Lokesh,
>
> thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline
> discussions on that before.
>
> On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> Hi Lokesh
>>
>> On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>> When trying to
Hi Lokesh,
thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline
discussions on that before.
On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Hi Lokesh
>
> On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> When trying to add support for different combination of cell
>>
Hi Lokesh
On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> Hi All,
> When trying to add support for different combination of cell
> configurations, there was a feedback saying why not to use device-tree
> instead of .c files for cell configurations. I am sure this topic must
> have been discussed
Hi All,
When trying to add support for different combination of cell
configurations, there was a feedback saying why not to use device-tree
instead of .c files for cell configurations. I am sure this topic must
have been discussed already. I am just curious about others opinion on
using