Re: [RFC] Device-Tree for cell configuration

2017-09-14 Thread Henning Schild
Am Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:59:57 +0200 schrieb Ralf Ramsauer : > Hi Lokesh, > > thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline > discussions on that before. > > On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > Hi Lokesh > > > > On 2017-09-12 16:03,

Re: [RFC] Device-Tree for cell configuration

2017-09-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 2017-09-13 15:59, Ralf Ramsauer wrote: > Hi Lokesh, > > thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline > discussions on that before. > > On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Hi Lokesh >> >> On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> When trying to

Re: [RFC] Device-Tree for cell configuration

2017-09-13 Thread Ralf Ramsauer
Hi Lokesh, thanks for picking up this topic -- we already had some offline discussions on that before. On 09/13/2017 10:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > Hi Lokesh > > On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote: >> Hi All, >> When trying to add support for different combination of cell >>

Re: [RFC] Device-Tree for cell configuration

2017-09-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
Hi Lokesh On 2017-09-12 16:03, Lokesh Vutla wrote: > Hi All, > When trying to add support for different combination of cell > configurations, there was a feedback saying why not to use device-tree > instead of .c files for cell configurations. I am sure this topic must > have been discussed

[RFC] Device-Tree for cell configuration

2017-09-12 Thread 'Lokesh Vutla' via Jailhouse
Hi All, When trying to add support for different combination of cell configurations, there was a feedback saying why not to use device-tree instead of .c files for cell configurations. I am sure this topic must have been discussed already. I am just curious about others opinion on using