On 11.04.20 20:37, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 11:28 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 11.04.20 19:25, 'Nikhil Devshatwar' via Jailhouse wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 4:31 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 11:28 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 11.04.20 19:25, 'Nikhil Devshatwar' via Jailhouse wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 4:31 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit was ignored, only reported to the console.
On 11.04.20 19:25, 'Nikhil Devshatwar' via Jailhouse wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 4:31 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit was ignored, only reported to the console. That
would have resulted in an inconsistent
On 11/04/20 10:55 pm, 'Nikhil Devshatwar' via Jailhouse wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 4:31 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit was ignored, only reported to the console. That
would have resulted in an inconsistent
Hi Jan,
On 11/04/20 4:31 pm, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit was ignored, only reported to the console. That
would have resulted in an inconsistent configuration being run. Also,
pvu_tlb_alloc and pvu_tlb_chain
From: Jan Kiszka
So far, any error returned by a function called by
pvu_iommu_config_commit was ignored, only reported to the console. That
would have resulted in an inconsistent configuration being run. Also,
pvu_tlb_alloc and pvu_tlb_chain didn't even report an errors at all, and
the former
From: Jan Kiszka
No functional change, just the for-statement more compact.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
hypervisor/arch/x86/vcpu.c | 7 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hypervisor/arch/x86/vcpu.c b/hypervisor/arch/x86/vcpu.c
index 676dc481..7a6543bf