Re: [PATCH 2/4] recipes-bsp: Add support for pine64-plus uboot

2020-02-14 Thread vijai kumar
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 8:25:40 PM UTC+5:30, vijai kumar wrote: > > > > On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 7:47:34 PM UTC+5:30, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> On 13.02.20 14:44, Vijai Kumar K wrote: >> > Add support for building pine64-plus u-boot. Use mainline u-boot + ATF. >> > >> > Build

Re: [PATCH 2/4] recipes-bsp: Add support for pine64-plus uboot

2020-02-13 Thread vijai kumar
On Thursday, February 13, 2020 at 7:47:34 PM UTC+5:30, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 13.02.20 14:44, Vijai Kumar K wrote: > > Add support for building pine64-plus u-boot. Use mainline u-boot + ATF. > > > > Build only the necessary envtools. u-boot tools-only build is broken > > upstream and hence

Re: [PATCH 2/4] recipes-bsp: Add support for pine64-plus uboot

2020-02-13 Thread Jan Kiszka
On 13.02.20 14:44, Vijai Kumar K wrote: Add support for building pine64-plus u-boot. Use mainline u-boot + ATF. Build only the necessary envtools. u-boot tools-only build is broken upstream and hence not supported here. Actually, there is rarely the need to use self-built tools. Those

[PATCH 2/4] recipes-bsp: Add support for pine64-plus uboot

2020-02-13 Thread Vijai Kumar K
Add support for building pine64-plus u-boot. Use mainline u-boot + ATF. Build only the necessary envtools. u-boot tools-only build is broken upstream and hence not supported here. Signed-off-by: Vijai Kumar K --- recipes-bsp/u-boot/files/pine64-plus-rules| 32 ++