> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>
> On 05.12.19 09:41, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in
> >> irqchip_inject_pending
> >>
> >> On 05.12.19 03:28, Peng Fan wrote:
>
On 05.12.19 09:41, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>>
>> On 05.12.19 03:28, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> Hi Jan,
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Jan Kiszka
&
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>
> On 05.12.19 03:28, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Jan Kiszka
> >> Sent: 2019年12月3日 17:18
> >> To: Peng Fan ; jailho
On 05.12.19 03:28, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>> Sent: 2019年12月3日 17:18
>> To: Peng Fan ; jailhouse-dev@googlegroups.com
>> Cc: Alice Guo
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_in
Hi Jan,
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Kiszka
> Sent: 2019年12月3日 17:18
> To: Peng Fan ; jailhouse-dev@googlegroups.com
> Cc: Alice Guo
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>
> On 03.12.19 10:15, Peng Fan wrote:
> >
On 03.12.19 10:15, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>>
>> On 03.12.19 09:58, Peng Fan wrote:
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in
>>>> irqchip_inject_pending
>>>>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>
> On 03.12.19 09:58, Peng Fan wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in
> >> irqchip_inject_pending
> >>
> >> On 03.12.19 09:27, Peng Fan wrote:
>
On 03.12.19 09:58, Peng Fan wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>>
>> On 03.12.19 09:27, Peng Fan wrote:
>>> Thinking about core0 is inject SGI to core1, core1 is handling SGI
>>> interrupt.
>>>
>>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm: irqchip: add lock in irqchip_inject_pending
>
> On 03.12.19 09:27, Peng Fan wrote:
> > Thinking about core0 is inject SGI to core1, core1 is handling SGI
> > interrupt.
> >
> > That means core0 might be in path to enqueue SGI into
On 03.12.19 09:27, Peng Fan wrote:
> Thinking about core0 is inject SGI to core1, core1 is handling SGI
> interrupt.
>
> That means core0 might be in path to enqueue SGI into the pending_irqs
> array, core1 might be in path handling SGI and pick one from
> pending_irqs array. So need to use lock t
10 matches
Mail list logo