Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-21 Thread Henning Schild
Am Thu, 21 Dec 2017 15:10:09 +0100 schrieb "[ext] Henning Schild" : > Am Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:42:26 -0800 > schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 17:13:41 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha > > scritto: > > > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-21 Thread Henning Schild
Am Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:42:26 -0800 schrieb Luca Cuomo : > Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 17:13:41 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha > scritto: > > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:41:34 -0800 > > schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > > > Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-20 Thread Luca Cuomo
Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 17:13:41 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha scritto: > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:41:34 -0800 > schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 16:22:37 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha > > scritto: > > > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:58:11 -0800 > > >

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-18 Thread Henning Schild
Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 07:41:34 -0800 schrieb Luca Cuomo : > Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 16:22:37 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha > scritto: > > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:58:11 -0800 > > schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-18 Thread Luca Cuomo
Il giorno lunedì 18 dicembre 2017 16:22:37 UTC+1, Henning Schild ha scritto: > Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:58:11 -0800 > schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I can now confirm that the patch 87fbf1f works and interrupts are > > > > received correctly, /dev/uiox

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-18 Thread Henning Schild
Am Mon, 18 Dec 2017 05:58:11 -0800 schrieb Luca Cuomo : > > > Hi, > > > > > > I can now confirm that the patch 87fbf1f works and interrupts are > > > received correctly, /dev/uiox is accessible and works as expected. > > > Without it, I got a: "FATAL: forbidden access

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-12-18 Thread Luca Cuomo
> > Hi, > > > > I can now confirm that the patch 87fbf1f works and interrupts are > > received correctly, /dev/uiox is accessible and works as expected. > > Without it, I got a: "FATAL: forbidden access (exception class 0x24)" > > but I don't remember if this was triggered by Jailhouse or Linux.

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-06 Thread Henning Schild
Am Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:41:52 -0700 schrieb Constantin Petra : > Hi, > > I can now confirm that the patch 87fbf1f works and interrupts are > received correctly, /dev/uiox is accessible and works as expected. > Without it, I got a: "FATAL: forbidden access (exception

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-05 Thread Constantin Petra
Hi, I can now confirm that the patch 87fbf1f works and interrupts are received correctly, /dev/uiox is accessible and works as expected. Without it, I got a: "FATAL: forbidden access (exception class 0x24)" but I don't remember if this was triggered by Jailhouse or Linux. Best Regards,

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Henning Schild
Am Fri, 1 Sep 2017 16:40:09 +0300 schrieb Constantin Petra : > Hi Henning, > > Ok, I missed that. The "jailhouse" branch works, at least I see the > expected messages: > > [ 46.200693] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: using jailhouse mode > [ 46.206260] uio_ivshmem

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Constantin Petra
Hi Henning, Ok, I missed that. The "jailhouse" branch works, at least I see the expected messages: [ 46.200693] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: using jailhouse mode [ 46.206260] uio_ivshmem 0001:00:03.0: regular IRQs and /dev/uio0 & /dev/uio1 up Related to the patch on jailhouse-next, is that the

Re: questions related to IVSHMEM/uio_ivshmem

2017-09-01 Thread Henning Schild
Am Fri, 1 Sep 2017 05:36:31 -0700 schrieb Constantin Petra : > Hi, > > I have a question related to this above driver implementation, in an > Ultrascale+ environment. > > This was taken from >