>> and so on.
>Namely?
Today any resource/site/service can be blacklisted by country government.
That's why i don't want to rely on some specific service or sip provider. I
prefer distributed/decentralized messengers like Jami or Tox.
> as for messaging — unfortunately, itʼs complicated. Iʼd
Сергей Петров wrote:
>> what exactly have motivated you and your friend to experiment with Jami,
>> instead of sticking with a standard, i. e. SIP-based, solution?
>
> Mostly it's because of privacy
‘Privacy’ is a buzzword, I suppose you mean end-to-end encryption.
Using standard SIP in no way
Сергей Петров writes:
> I have found lists of public STUN servers (
> https://gist.github.com/mondain/b0ec1cf5f60ae726202e and
> https://gist.github.com/sagivo/3a4b2f2c7ac6e1b5267c2f1f59ac6c6b), but only
> a few TURN's. It seems a bit strange.
With STUN, you basically send a small number of
I have found lists of public STUN servers (
https://gist.github.com/mondain/b0ec1cf5f60ae726202e and
https://gist.github.com/sagivo/3a4b2f2c7ac6e1b5267c2f1f59ac6c6b), but only
a few TURN's. It seems a bit strange.
> what exactly have motivated you and your friend to experiment with Jami,
instead
FWIW, jami is also a SIP phone
