On Thu, 2009-07-16 at 01:20 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> 2009/7/15 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munte...@linux360.ro>:
> > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:53:30AM +0200, Vegard Nossum wrote:
> >> 2009/7/15 Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munte...@linux360.ro>:
> >> > This fixes stack frame operations on x86-64 to take into account the
> >> > saved registers and the stack slot size.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munte...@linux360.ro>
> >> > ---
> >> > ??arch/x86/stack-frame.c | ?? ??6 +++++-
> >> > ??1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/arch/x86/stack-frame.c b/arch/x86/stack-frame.c
> >> > index d9f989f..1e660fd 100644
> >> > --- a/arch/x86/stack-frame.c
> >> > +++ b/arch/x86/stack-frame.c
> >> > @@ -59,11 +59,15 @@
> >> > ??* ?? ?? | ?? Local m ?? ??:
> >> > ??* ?? ?? +--------------+
> >> > ??*/
> >> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> > ??#define ARGS_START_OFFSET (sizeof(unsigned long) * 5)
> >> > +#else
> >> > +#define ARGS_START_OFFSET (sizeof(unsigned long) * 7)
> >> > +#endif
> >>
> >> It would be nice to know what exactly the 7 is. Can we have a pretty
> >> diagram like for x86_32 (or modify the diagram to take x86_64 into
> >> account)?
> >>
> 
> guys, wouldn't it be cleaner to write something like this:
> 
> #define ARGS_START_OFFSET offsetof(struct jit_stack_frame, args)

Yup, makes sense. Can someone send a patch?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Jatovm-devel mailing list
Jatovm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jatovm-devel

Reply via email to