On Mon, 2009-06-01 at 09:58 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Tomek,
>
> On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 14:22 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> > We should backpatch all relative call sites regardless of kind of the
> > method. That's because 'invokespecial' instruction can emit relative
> > calls to methods wh
Hi Tomek,
On Sat, 2009-05-30 at 14:22 +0200, Tomek Grabiec wrote:
> We should backpatch all relative call sites regardless of kind of the
> method. That's because 'invokespecial' instruction can emit relative
> calls to methods which are not static and are not constructors, for
> example when cal
We should backpatch all relative call sites regardless of kind of the
method. That's because 'invokespecial' instruction can emit relative
calls to methods which are not static and are not constructors, for
example when calling a private method.
Signed-off-by: Tomek Grabiec
---
arch/x86/emit-co