Quoting Nic Ferrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm wih Jon most of the way here... to be honest I can't see much
> difference between:
>
>$substitution
>
> or
>
>
Do you see a difference here:
$substitution
versus
Your only option really if you want to do it in an XML friendly
"Nic Ferrier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't want to but I bet given an hour and a half I could melt one
> of the GNOME HTML editors into dealing with simple Webmacro issues
> like variables.
>
I thought the discussion here partly where on separation of work. I don't
know the business we
Nic Ferrier wrote:
> I'm wih Jon most of the way here... to be honest I can't see much
> difference between:
>
>$substitution
>
> or
>
>
>
> except that mr/mrs/ms balck-polo-neck has a 2 more characters to deal
> with in the latter.
Hmmm, that's like saying "use short variable names s
>>> Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 19-Apr-00 11:36:52 AM >>>
If I may chip in here:
Kevin wrote:
>> Then it is up to your tagging department to actually
>>implement the design using whatever tools appropriate
>>for the job.
Stefano wrote:
>Correct.
>Jon is right saying that XML is not
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> Gunnar R|nning wrote:
> >
> > "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > The point is that a designer should never have to touch ASCII. The
> > > should just design the page and that is it. Looking at a specification
> > > in XML (they already know HTML
jon * wrote:
>
> on 4/17/00 3:00 PM, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> No. It is a pretty website (just like a slideshow and a book is a pretty
> >> presentation). It isn't a web application.
> >
> > Given your statement, you're right. But the line is thin, don't you
> > agree?
