DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34673] - ConstantScoreRangeQuery - fixes "too many clauses" exception

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34673] - ConstantScoreRangeQuery - fixes "too many clauses" exception

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34673] New: - ConstantScoreRangeQuery - fixes "too many clauses" exception

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-28 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
I like this! I also think this should be in the core. This would allow one to partition an index and spread it over multiple disks, for instance. I like the name ParallelReader, but I wonder if people will confuse it with "Aha, an IndexReader that reads multiple indices in parallel (using thread

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-28 Thread Andrzej Bialecki
Doug Cutting wrote: Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. Would folks find this useful? This looks very useful. It gives an easy way

Re: Jakarta image on lucene.apache.org

2005-04-28 Thread Daniel Naber
On Thursday 28 April 2005 00:16, Daniel Naber wrote: > > This 'site' SVN repo is for Jakarta projects. ÂIs there one for TLPs? > > Apache httpd has its own "site" directory. We might need that, too. I just had a closer look and got it working on my machine. The directory structure now looks like

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-28 Thread Chuck Williams
Doug Cutting writes (4/28/2005 2:19 PM): Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. Would folks find this useful? Yes, very useful, especi

ParallelReader

2005-04-28 Thread Doug Cutting
Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. Would folks find this useful? Should it go into the core or in contrib? Doug Index: src/java/or

[Patch] IndexReader.finalize() performance

2005-04-28 Thread Wolfgang Hoschek
Here is the first and most high-priority patch I've settled on to get Lucene to work efficiently for the typical usage scenarios of MemoryIndex. More patches are forthcoming if this one is received favourably... There's large overhead involved in forcing all IndexReader impls to have a fin

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34359] - Cannot use Lucene in an unsigned applet due to Java security restrictions

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34359] - Cannot use Lucene in an unsigned applet due to Java security restrictions

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34359] - Cannot use Lucene in an unsigned applet due to Java security restrictions

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34359] - Cannot use Lucene in an unsigned applet due to Java security restrictions

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34629] - [PATCH] Document update contrib (Play with term postings or .. to a easy way to update)

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34629] - [PATCH] Document update contrib (Play with term postings or .. to a easy way to update)

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

2005-04-28 Thread Chuck Williams
Wolf Siberski wrote: --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-27 17:15 --- Wolf's revisions to my changes to Query.combine() look fine. The single-query optimization is good -- my oversight to have not included it originally. I don't believe either of the other two chang

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34629] - [PATCH] Document update contrib (Play with term postings or .. to a easy way to update)

2005-04-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31841] - [PATCH] MultiSearcher problems with Similarity.docFreq()

2005-04-28 Thread Wolf Siberski
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-04-27 17:15 --- Wolf's revisions to my changes to Query.combine() look fine. The single-query optimization is good -- my oversight to have not included it originally. I don't believe either of the other two changes is necessary, but the