DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34629] - [PATCH] Document update contrib (Play with term postings or .. to a easy way to update)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Remove TermEnum.skipTo(Term target)

On May 4, 2005, at 4:44 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: On Wednesday 04 May 2005 22:59, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: I was considering an efficient impl of TermEnum.skipTo(Term target) for the MemoryIndex. But then I realized that nothing anywhere in Lucene calls that method. It's part of the API (public metho

Re: svn commit: r168213 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/FSDirectory.java

On Thursday 05 May 2005 01:40, Doug Cutting wrote: > I'd prefer if the list of file extensions was in a single place, and > that place should be somewhere in the index package, not in the store > package. I will try to move it. BTW, index/SegmentReader.java refers to an extension "tvp" which I c

Re: Remove TermEnum.skipTo(Term target)

On Wednesday 04 May 2005 22:59, Wolfgang Hoschek wrote: > I was considering an efficient impl of TermEnum.skipTo(Term target) for > the MemoryIndex. But then I realized that nothing anywhere in Lucene > calls that method. It's part of the API (public method in a public class), so we cannot just

Re: svn commit: r168213 - in /lucene/java/trunk: CHANGES.txt src/java/org/apache/lucene/store/FSDirectory.java

I'd prefer if the list of file extensions was in a single place, and that place should be somewhere in the index package, not in the store package. Doug - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail

Remove TermEnum.skipTo(Term target)

I was considering an efficient impl of TermEnum.skipTo(Term target) for the MemoryIndex. But then I realized that nothing anywhere in Lucene calls that method. It's effectively dead code; a remainder of a previous ice age - nothing would break if it would be removed. I'd suggest doing so unless

RE: java.util.zip (was Questions about DeleteFile method)

Interesting to know that "<>, it is no surprise that the java.util.zip namespace is available to developers through the J# runtime." I wonder if some of the latest developments in Lucene-Java, can be ported to C# (.NET) via the J# runtime. J.D. -Original Message- From: Chuck Williams [ma

Re: java.util.zip (was Questions about DeleteFile method)

Doug Cutting wrote: Monsur Hossain wrote: George, what about SharpZipLib: http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/Default.aspx It's a third-party project, but its written in C# and is under GPL. GPL unfortunately means that the library cannot be distributed by Apache with Lucene.Net. Ge

Re: java.util.zip (was Questions about DeleteFile method)

Monsur Hossain wrote: George, what about SharpZipLib: http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/Default.aspx It's a third-party project, but its written in C# and is under GPL. GPL unfortunately means that the library cannot be distributed by Apache with Lucene.Net. Doug -

RE: java.util.zip (was Questions about DeleteFile method)

Hi, I am not too excited about using SharpZipLib -- if I use it, unlike now, DotLucene will end up with a 3rd party dependency thus, the port can't be used out of the box. I know, I might not have a better alternative. Regards, -- George Aroush -Original Message- From: Pasha Bizhan [ma