Nice approach. Should SortComparatorSource include a new method decl for
SortComparatorSource.newComparator (IndexReader reader, String
fieldname, Object valueParser) ?
RBP
On 5/10/05, Doug Cutting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified
Hey now... you're going to obsolete all my in-house code and put me
out of a job ;-)
Could you elaborate on the advantage of having say a TermQuery that
could be either normal-scoring or constant-scoring vs two different
Query classes for doing this? They seem roughly equivalent.
> 1. Add two m
This does solve one problem I was having. There are still a few
issues I still need to solve:
- double and long support?
- Sorting support for multiple indexed fields mapped onto a single
field using fieldname=fieldvalue.For example, when field "x" is
specified, I actually need just a slice
Doug Cutting wrote:
Shouldn't the search code already take care of that?
No, the search may return documents that happen to contain "Doug
Cutting" and Google - the current highlighter implementation uses all
query terms (ignoring any AND/OR() operators) and looks for matches.
Ideally "Doug Cut
I did the nearly the exact same thing in my "derived" Lucene. But in order
to limit modifications to the Lucene core, I created a QueryCache class, and
have derived versions of Prefix and Range query consult the class, passing
in the IndexReader and query to see if there is a cached result. I also
Background: In http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34673,
Yonik Seely proposes a ConstantScoreQuery, based on a Filter. And in
http://www.mail-archive.com/lucene-dev@jakarta.apache.org/msg08007.html
I proposed a mechanism to promote the use of Filters. Through all of
this, Paul
+1
like the idea!
Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified
parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a date
field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer.
Comments?
Doug
--
Andi Vajda wrote:
The Ruby work may be from scratch, I don't know. But the project to
incubate, the project we've been talking about for a while now,
SWIGLucene-unless-we-come-up-with-a-better-name, would include PyLucene,
not from scratch, RubyLucene, and maybe others.
Attached is a message I s
markharw00d wrote:
Before we leap into adding code into the highlighter though I think it's
worth considering what we are trying to fix here in a more general sense.
As a basic principle I think highlighting should attempt to show the
user what the search engine saw as important in the document.
Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified
parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a date
field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer.
Comments?
Doug
Index: src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/FieldCache.java
=
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can (and probably will) change it such that is not run if
> JavaCC is not present and adjust it so that the check for JavaCC is
> only done on the targets that truly need it (but are not part of the
> main build path).
This may be
I'm cross-posting to java-dev just to let folks know we've moved this
conversation over to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 10, 2005, at 8:14 AM, Brian McCallister wrote:
The ruby part of it is from scratch, but I am using Andi's work
extensively, and it relies on that work for all practical purposes.
On May 9, 2005, at 9:34 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 9, 2005, at 3:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Feel free to add any "new" dependencies Gump is missing.
What's the process for me to add new dependencies?
If the project you depend on i
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
15 matches
Mail list logo