Re: Lucene JIRA e-mail notifications

2005-09-18 Thread Jeff Turner
Hi, On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 05:56:24AM -0400, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Lucene was recently converted from Bugzilla to JIRA. I'm unfamiliar > with JIRA's administrative options, but I see that I have > administrative capability on our installation and have seen the > "Lucene Notification Scheme

Re: Version 1.9

2005-09-18 Thread John Haxby
John Haxby wrote: [...] compiled with gcj that I believe is compiled with gcj [...] It's only compiled once with gcj, if at all :-) You can get it from http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/core/updates/4/SRPMS/lucene-1.4.3-1jpp_3fc.src.rpm A quick inspection of the .spec file

Re: Version 1.9

2005-09-18 Thread John Haxby
Jeff Breidenbach wrote: 2) Is anyone testing against kaffe or other non-sun compilers? This is important to Debian as any software that can only be built from a closed-source JDK is considered a second class citizen. As you can see, we've been poking at this issue on Lucene 1.4.3 for quite some

Re: Version 1.9

2005-09-18 Thread DM Smith
On 9/18/05, Jeff Breidenbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Putting on my Debian maintainer hat: > > 1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship > Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...) I think it should include what is available. If pre-2.0, it should be 1.4.3and

Lucene JIRA e-mail notifications

2005-09-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
Lucene was recently converted from Bugzilla to JIRA. I'm unfamiliar with JIRA's administrative options, but I see that I have administrative capability on our installation and have seen the "Lucene Notification Scheme" that appears to be sending notifications to [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL

Re: Version 1.9

2005-09-18 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Sep 18, 2005, at 3:41 AM, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: 1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...) 1.9 deprecates a lot of API, and 2.0 will be the same version with all the deprecated stuff removed. So if folks jump straight

Re: Version 1.9

2005-09-18 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Putting on my Debian maintainer hat: 1) Does it make sense for Linux distributions to ship Lucene 1.9, or simply wait for 2.0? (I'm thinking 2.0...) 2) Is anyone testing against kaffe or other non-sun compilers? This is important to Debian as any software that can only be built from a closed-sou