[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-507) CLONE -[PATCH] remove unused variables

2006-03-06 Thread Steven Tamm (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-507?page=all ] Steven Tamm updated LUCENE-507: --- Attachment: Unused.patch This fixes unnecessary casts, unused imports, unused private methods, and unused private variables. Most of the changes were in the Jav

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-507) CLONE -[PATCH] remove unused variables

2006-03-06 Thread Steven Tamm (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-507?page=comments#action_12369106 ] Steven Tamm commented on LUCENE-507: I haven't included a patch, although I can generate one easily. As a matter of course, javadoc references that aren't included in an i

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-507) CLONE -[PATCH] remove unused variables

2006-03-06 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-507?page=comments#action_12369101 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-507: - I haven't looked at the patch, but I know that I've removed unused imports before and got burnt, because classes in imports

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-500) Lucene 2.0 requirements - Remove all deprecated code

2006-03-06 Thread Daniel Naber (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-500?page=comments#action_12369080 ] Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-500: - RangeQueries built via QueryParser are probably common, but not necessarily those that parse the local date format to a DateField, a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-500) Lucene 2.0 requirements - Remove all deprecated code

2006-03-06 Thread Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-500?page=comments#action_12369050 ] Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-500: I am not sure what the implications of not changing it are. Are Query Parser generated Range Queries really that exotic?

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-330) [PATCH] Use filter bits for next() and skipTo() in FilteredQuery

2006-03-06 Thread Erik Hatcher
Paul, I owe you a big apology for the hassle it appears. I have been running from my IDE (IntelliJ) and that test was failing, and I had gone and cleaned up lots of modified Lucene source files from previous uncommitted patches and ensured my environment was only this one change. I had

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-330) [PATCH] Use filter bits for next() and skipTo() in FilteredQuery

2006-03-06 Thread Paul Elschot
On Sunday 05 March 2006 23:51, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > On Mar 5, 2006, at 5:41 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote: > > Yes, the SHOULD clauses do pass with an expected and actual result > > of 2 documents. However, changing both to MUST expects 0 documents > > yet the actual number is 2. > > To clarify,