Hi,
I want to use the PorterStemmer class, but as it is not visible to
outside the package I am unable to use it.
Is their any specific reason that PorterStemmer is not public?
Thanks & Regards,
Sr. Software Engineer
I- Link Infosoft (G) Pvt . Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Recency weightage in Lucene
:
: I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include
: the document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents
: gets preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for
: news search.
FunctionQuery is yo
: If this is the case, who ever has the karma to fix this, can you take care
: of it?
I think the proper way to deal with this is to file a Jira request with
the Infrastructure Project in the JIRA component, but I'm not 100% sure.
: Also, I can't figure out how to assign, close or even edit a JI
Any specific reason why PorterStemmer class in org.apache.lucene.analysis is
not made public?
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Bhoomi Mehta
Sr. Project Leader
I- Link Infosoft (G) Pvt . Ltd.
Ahmedabad
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To un
Using the doc-id itself as a recency metric is smart thinking. But the weight
is actually a sigmoidal function based on the oldness(i.e.
currentTime-documentIndexingTime), hence just cant use the doc-id itself.
What is the JIRA BUGid for the lazy fiekd capability. Woudl like to know more
abou
Are you sure about the JVM numbers? I would think that user + sys must
always be < real (unless maybe the multiprocessor affects this - i.e. sums
the processor time used on each).
-Original Message-
From: Vic Bancroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:55 AM
To: [EMA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/17/2006 10:52 PM:
> I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include the
> document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents gets
> preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for news
> search.
>
> (I b
JMA wrote on 06/17/2006 10:16 PM:
> 1) Is there a way to find a document that has null fields?
> For example, if I have two fields (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME) for World Cup
> players:
>
> FIRST_NAME: Brian LAST_NAME: McBride
> FIRST_NAME: Agustin LAST_NAME: Delgado
> FIRST_NAME: Zinha
Robert Engels wrote:
Do you have any hard numbers to support this? The last time I checked, gcj
had minimal improvement over JVM 1.5.
In terms of speed, there is not much difference between native code and
classes (see sample timings). However, the pragmatic availability of
java 5 environ
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416660 ]
paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605:
-
I tried removing the Explanation constructor that is deprecated in the
demo-fix.patch.
One of the uses of this constructor is in the
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416658 ]
paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605:
-
I like the Boolean for indicating the match.
The demo-fix.patch applies cleanly on my working copy, and all tests pass with
it.
I'll
I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include the
document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents gets
preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for news search.
(I believe) To do this I have to tinker with TermScorer.score() me
Greetings,
In honor of the world cup and players that use 1 name only,
can someone help me with the following...
1) Is there a way to find a document that has null fields?
For example, if I have two fields (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME) for World Cup players:
FIRST_NAME: Brian LAST_NAME: McBri
13 matches
Mail list logo
