Re: 2.0.1 release? -- was Re: Web search demo does not work

2006-07-27 Thread Michael McCandless
Does anyone think it might be worth while to put out a 2.0.1 release? +1 Mike - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: 2.0.1 release? -- was Re: Web search demo does not work

2006-07-27 Thread Grant Ingersoll
+1 On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: Does anyone think it might be worth while to put out a 2.0.1 release? I'm not a big fan of official releases in general, but a lot of users put a lot of faith in them, and we've had numereous questions about the bug in the demo war

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-637) class HitDoc should be inner class or in its own .java file

2006-07-27 Thread alan ezust (JIRA)
class HitDoc should be inner class or in its own .java file --- Key: LUCENE-637 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-637 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Wish Affects

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-637) class HitDoc should be inner class or in its own .java file

2006-07-27 Thread Erik Hatcher (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-637?page=all ] Erik Hatcher closed LUCENE-637. --- Resolution: Invalid class HitDoc should be inner class or in its own .java file ---

Re: 2.0.1 release? -- was Re: Web search demo does not work

2006-07-27 Thread Simon Willnauer
+1 On 7/27/06, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Jul 27, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote: Does anyone think it might be worth while to put out a 2.0.1 release? I'm not a big fan of official releases in general, but a lot of users put a lot of faith in them, and

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-638) Can't put non-index files (e.g. CVS, SVN directories) in a Lucene index directory

2006-07-27 Thread Eleanor Joslin (JIRA)
Can't put non-index files (e.g. CVS, SVN directories) in a Lucene index directory - Key: LUCENE-638 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-638 Project: Lucene

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-638) Can't put non-index files (e.g. CVS, SVN directories) in a Lucene index directory

2006-07-27 Thread Daniel Naber (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-638?page=comments#action_12423893 ] Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-638: - What exactly does your code look like? Something else must be wrong because I use an index that's committed to CVS

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-624) Segment size limit for compound files

2006-07-27 Thread Michael Busch
robert engels wrote: Why does more segment files improve search performance? I can see that if you have many smaller files, the merge process for incremental adds might be faster, but more segments should actually make searching slower. Robert, I did not run my own performance experiments,

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-624) Segment size limit for compound files

2006-07-27 Thread robert engels
In my experience, the more segment files the worse the performance (thus the optimize method). On Jul 27, 2006, at 7:44 PM, Michael Busch wrote: robert engels wrote: Why does more segment files improve search performance? I can see that if you have many smaller files, the merge process for

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-624) Segment size limit for compound files

2006-07-27 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
Probably not during indexing, which is what Michael was referring to in his last email, if I understood him correctly. I suppose indexing with compound format would be a bit slower because individual index files will have to be compounded in a .cfs file, and that'll consume a bit of extra time.