[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-648?page=comments#action_12427449 ]
Jason Polites commented on LUCENE-648:
--
I you find that compression level has a meaningful impact (which it may not as
suggested), one approach for a low-impa
I don't understand why the compressed fields are not just handled
externally in the Document class - just add uncompress/compress
methods. This way all Lucene needs to understand is binary fields,
and you don't have any of these problems during merging or initial
indexing.
On Aug 11, 2006
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-648?page=comments#action_12427421 ]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-648:
--
I think the compression level is only one part of the performance problem.
Another drawback of the current implementat
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-648?page=comments#action_12427394 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-648:
---
Good question! I will try to get the original document if possible and also
run some simple tests to see th
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-648?page=comments#action_12427385 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-648:
Just curious, have you tried other values in here to see what kind of
difference it makes before we go looking for
On 8/11/06, Yonik Seeley (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-642?page=comments#action_12427360 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-642:
-
OK I checked this in because it's more of a code check-in than a patch to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-642?page=comments#action_12427360 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-642:
-
OK I checked this in because it's more of a code check-in than a patch to a
stable system, and the top level "ant test-c
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-642?page=all ]
Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-642:
---
Attachment: 10_08_06.diff
Organized imports;
Applied against a clean copy;
All test passed on 2 machines;
best regards simon
> GData Server IndexCompon
Allow changing of ZIP compression level for compressed fields
-
Key: LUCENE-648
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-648
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Damned, I misst to organize the imports in that class, I will correct
that tonight! Thanks for applying the patch, quiet a lot of code isn't
it!
regards simon
On 8/10/06, Yonik Seeley (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-642?page=comments#action_12
10 matches
Mail list logo
