: Given the trouble people routinely get themselves into using RangeQuery
: would it make sense to change the "rewrite" method to generate a
: ConstantScoreQuery wrapping a RangeFilter?
As much as i hate RangeQuery, i can imagine situations where people wnat
the scoring subtleties that it current
This question was raised in the user's list -
http://www.nabble.com/highlighting-tf2322109.html
Assume three fragments and two queries:
f1 = aa 11 bb 33 cc
f2 = aa 11 bb 11 cc
f3 = aa 11 bb 22 cc
q1 = 11 22
q2 = 11
Now we call highlighter.getBestFragment(q);
For q1, f3 is re
: The top of the stack was the stack I posted. I am not able to give the
: entire stack, but this is the important part. The exception is something
: about searching with null.
when i say "the top of the stack trace" i mean what you just described:
"something about searching with null" .. what
djd0383 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/09/2006 14:17:56:
> What are the Store and Index classes? It does not seem that my version
of
> Lucene is using them
That code was using Lucene 2.0.
In Lucene 1.4.3 you would add the docs like this:
boolean store = false;
boolean index = true;
What are the Store and Index classes? It does not seem that my version of
Lucene is using them
Doron Cohen wrote:
>
> djd0383 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/09/2006 11:21:13:
>> Those two message print the following:
>> For qtxt 1* the result query is allText:1* and
>> The analyzer in us
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676?page=all ]
Andi Vajda updated LUCENE-676:
--
Attachment: PrefixFilter.java
Attached is a version of PrefixFilter that could be added to the Lucene core as
submitted by Yura Smolsky, a PyLucene user.
> Promot
Promote solr's PrefixFilter into Java Lucene's core
---
Key: LUCENE-676
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-676
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components:
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-662?page=comments#action_12437644 ]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-662:
It is due to lazy loading. A lazy field, when being retreived data, have to
know how to read the stream. In the cu
djd0383 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 25/09/2006 11:21:13:
> Those two message print the following:
> For qtxt 1* the result query is allText:1* and
> The analyzer in use is:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
This output seems ok - the analyzer is standard and seems to me the r
Those two message print the following:
For qtxt 1* the result query is allText:1*
and
The analyzer in use is: org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
- org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardAnalyzer
I hope this helps. Thank you for all your help.
Doron Cohen wrote:
>
>
>
> My QueryParser looks like this:
> query = QueryParser.parse("1*","allText",analyzer);
>
> analyzer is predetermited for this class. Is there something special I
> should be setting in this to allow for this search string?
Is it a custom analyzer or one of Lucene's analyzers?
Examining the resu
For real search engine, performance is the most important factor. I think
file system based system is better than storing the indexes in database
because of the pure speed you will get.
Cheers,
Jian
On 9/25/06, Simon Willnauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have a look at the compass framework
ht
My QueryParser looks like this:
query = QueryParser.parse("1*","allText",analyzer);
analyzer is predetermited for this class. Is there something special I
should be setting in this to allow for this search string?
Thanks again!
Doron Cohen wrote:
>
> djd0383 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22
Given the trouble people routinely get themselves into using RangeQuery would
it make sense to change the "rewrite" method to generate a ConstantScoreQuery
wrapping a RangeFilter?
The only disadvantages I can see would be:
1) Scoring would change - some users may find their apps produce differe
On Sep 24, 2006, at 11:44 PM, David Balmain wrote:
Hi Greg,
I don't know which documentation of the Lucene FileFormat you are
looking at but you can see UInt32 (Int) UInt64 (Long) and VInt defined
here:
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/fileformats.html
That's where I was looking. Nowher
The top of the stack was the stack I posted. I am not able to give the
entire stack, but this is the important part. The exception is something
about searching with null.
When I say that I am searching for '1', the user is phyisically entering '1'
into the search form and submitting. This sear
Have a look at the compass framework
http://www.opensymphony.com/compass/
Compass also provides a Lucene Jdbc Directory implementation, allowing
storing Lucene index within a database for both pure Lucene
applications and Compass enabled applications.
best regards simon
On 9/25/06, Reuven Ivgi
Hello,
I have just started to work with Lucene
Is it possible to define the index files of lucene to be on a database
(such as MySql), just for backup and restore porposes
Thanks in Advance
Reuven Ivgi
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-662?page=comments#action_12437543 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-662:
Haven't looked fully at the patch, but one thing I am curious about is why
remove the Fieldable interface?
> Exte
19 matches
Mail list logo
