javacc-uptodate-check:
javacc-notice:
[echo]
[echo] One or more of the JavaCC .jj files is newer than its
corresponding
[echo] .java file. Run the "javacc" target to regenerate the
artifacts.
[echo]
init:
common.compile-core:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tm
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-661?page=all ]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-661:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-661.patch.txt
Managed not to set the grant button on the original.
> BUILD.txt instructions wrong for JavaCC
> ---
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-703?page=comments#action_12446400 ]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-703:
-
If we're going to do this, do we want to add support for "*" like
SolrQueryParser has...
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubato
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446397 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701:
-
Thanks for all the details Michael! A few more random comments and questions:
In the future, it might be nice if there
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-702?page=comments#action_12446376 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-702:
---
That seems like a reasonable approach? At least the index would be
consistent (ie, loadable).
Though, if y
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=all ]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-584:
Attachment: SortedVIntList.java
Corrected javadoc refs to use IndexInput and IndexOutput.
> Decouple Filter from BitSet
> ---
>
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=all ]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-584:
Attachment: (was: SortedVIntList.java)
> Decouple Filter from BitSet
> ---
>
> Key: LUCENE-584
> URL
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-667?page=comments#action_12446362 ]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-667:
--
Dang. Sorry about that. I must have copied the build.xml in order facilitate
checking the javacc results. I didn't int
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-667?page=all ]
Hoss Man resolved LUCENE-667.
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.1)
Resolution: Fixed
1) This patch seems to have been inlcuded in the patch to LUCENE-489 that Otis
commited in r468291
2) Even be
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446346 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
> In the absense of contention, have you noticed any performance differences in
> opening an IndexReader?
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446344 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
> > on one platform (OS X) I found that the directory listing can be incorrect
> > (stale) by up to 1.0 seco
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12446342 ]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-701:
---
Thanks Yonik for looking at this!
> Could you elaborate on how the backward compatibility works w.r.t. modif
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-372?page=all ]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-372:
-
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available]
Bugzilla Id: (was: 34447)
Fix Version/s: 2.1
Affects Version/s: 2.0.0
1.9
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-372?page=all ]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-372:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-372.patch.txt
Somehow the patch got some extra line feeds in some of the javacc created
files. This version takes those out.
> Unmatched
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-372?page=all ]
Steven Parkes updated LUCENE-372:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-372.patch.txt
Somehow the patch got some extra line feeds in some of the javacc created
files. This version takes those out.
> Unmatched
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-702?page=comments#action_12446307 ]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-702:
A possible solution to this issue is to check, when writing segment infos to
"segments" in directory d,
whether dir of a segment i
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-703?page=comments#action_12446267 ]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-703:
-
In my opinion the positives of this change outweigh the negatives but is it
worth consulting the java-user mailing list
17 matches
Mail list logo
