[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-663) New feature rich higlighter for Lucene.

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-663?page=comments#action_12447678 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on LUCENE-663: --- [[ Old comment, sent from unregistered email on Mon, 23 Oct 2006 04:09:23 -0700 ]] Hello Kar

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-634) QueryParser is not applicable for the arguments (String, String, Analyzer) error in results.jsp when executing search in the browser (demo from Lucene 2.0)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-634?page=comments#action_12447663 ] [EMAIL PROTECTED] commented on LUCENE-634: [[ Old comment, sent by email on Wed, 9 Aug 2006 10:18:06 -0400 ]] > QueryParser is not applicable

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-565) Supporting deleteDocuments in IndexWriter (Code and Performance Results Provided)

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-565?page=comments#action_12447657 ] Ning Li commented on LUCENE-565: [[ Old comment, sent by email on Thu, 6 Jul 2006 07:53:35 -0700 ]] Hi Otis, I will regenerate the patch and add more comments

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-707: --- Attachment: new-site.patch First draft of Forrest (http://forrest.apache.org) based Lucene website. You need Forrest 0.7 to build it. I will try to pos

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-701) Lock-less commits

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12447601 ] Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-701: -- I'm all for the patch ... the only thing I'm wondering is about release timing, if that's issue? This changes the on-d

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-686) Resources not always reclaimed in scorers after each search

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-686?page=comments#action_12447596 ] Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-686: -- Came across these: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/34085#34085 http://www.gossamer-threads.com/l

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-701) Lock-less commits

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=comments#action_12447574 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-701: - Looks good Michael, I think this is ready to commit! Does anyone have any concerns with this going into the trunk? > Loc

query string

To escap "-", I wrote query like Index_Stored:\"index\\-stored*\". It works as I expected. But if I modify query like Index_Stored:index\\-stored*. It does not work. Do I need " for every query term? Thanks a lot. -- Haipeng Du Software Engineer Comphealth, Salt Lake City

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-701) Lock-less commits

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-701?page=all ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-701: -- Attachment: lockless-commits-patch2.txt OK, another version of the lockless commits patch with these fixes: - Added new unit test (TestIndexFileD

Re: Hibernate Lucene trademark issues

Here's my understanding. Lucene is a trademark of Apache. In the context of search technology, Lucene should only be used to refer to Apache Lucene, and that must be unambiguous. Thus if there's a chance that someone might think you're talking about "JBoss Lucene" then you must make it clear

Hibernate Lucene trademark issues

Hi guys, I'm Emmanuel Bernard from JBoss. I'm the current lead developer of the Hibernate Lucene integration module. The goal of this project is to facilitate the integration of a search capability to Hibernate based applications. And guess what, I use Lucene ;-) http://www.hibernate.org/hib_doc

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-707) Lucene Java Site docs

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=all ] Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-707: -- Assignee: Grant Ingersoll > Lucene Java Site docs > - > > Key: LUCENE-707 > URL: http://issues.a