[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber updated LUCENE-886:
Attachment: spellchecker-cleanup.diff
cleanup patch
> spellchecker cleanup
>
spellchecker cleanup
Key: LUCENE-886
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-886
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Affects Versions: 2.1
Reporter: Daniel Naber
Attachments:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Sean Timm wrote:
Andi Vajda wrote on 5/18/2007, 9:50 PM:
> As the maintainer of the contrib/db tree, I should point out that indeed,
> the bdb part depends on a C release of Sleepycat's (now Oracle)
> Berkeley DB.
Would it make sense to migrate to the BDB Java Edition?
h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497173
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-885:
-
Paul: i can't reproduce the problem you describe..
> Also, in contrib/surround
: Would it make sense to migrate to the BDB Java Edition?
:
: http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-db/je/index.html
unless i'm missing something, both versions are currently supported
(contrib/db/bdb and contrib/db/bdb-je)
-Hoss
-
Andi Vajda wrote on 5/18/2007, 9:50 PM:
> As the maintainer of the contrib/db tree, I should point out that indeed,
> the bdb part depends on a C release of Sleepycat's (now Oracle)
> Berkeley DB.
Would it make sense to migrate to the BDB Java Edition?
http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber updated LUCENE-403:
Assignee: (was: Lucene Developers)
Summary: Alternate Lucene Query Highlighter (was: Alter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber closed LUCENE-883.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Av
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-882?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daniel Naber closed LUCENE-882.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
patch a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-885?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12497132
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-885:
-
The patch applies cleanly on my trunk working copy (using patch -p0 <
*88
On Friday 18 May 2007 18:52, Doug Cutting wrote:
...
>
> Paul Elschot wrote:
> > When a contrib fails and is not fixed, that might be a good reason to
> > remove it from the distribution. With such a policy the present contribs
would
> > also stay up to date, provided their tests are good enough.
:
: According to the Berkeley DB Java/C interface sources, this call look like:
:- on Unix
: System.loadLibrary("libdb_java-" + VERSION_MAJOR + "." + VERSION_MINOR)
:- on Windows
: System.loadLibrary("libdb_java" + VERSION_MAJOR + VERSION_MINOR)
really? ... can you give a link to
12 matches
Mail list logo