[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498714 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- I wonder if we should just add a ctor to BufferedIndexInput that takes

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498757 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- Actually, it does have a default public constructor right? Ie if we

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498776 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- I plan to add private int bufferSize to BufferedIndexInput,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498780 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-888: -- OK I will do this. Actually, I think we should also allow making the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498784 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-888: --- OK I will do this. Actually, I think we should also allow

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-888) Improve indexing performance by increasing internal buffer sizes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498787 ] Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-888: I would like to know why these gains are appearing, and how

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-430) Reducing buffer sizes for TermDocs.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12498792 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-430: -- OK, I committed this patch that delays the allocation of the buffer

Re: [jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

Chris Hostetter wrote: : With this committed it also makes sense to deprecate the setUseScorer14() : method and the corresponding get...() method. If you want a patch for that, : I'll gladly provide one. i haven't really been able to follow this issue as much as i would like, but docs now

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-730: -- Assignee: Michael Busch Lucene Fields: (was: [Patch Available, New]) As discussed

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-730: - Fix Version/s: 2.2 Restore top level disjunction performance

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-730) Restore top level disjunction performance

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-730?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-730: - Attachment: lucene-730.patch With this patch the old BooleanScorer is only used if

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-866) Multi-level skipping on posting lists

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-866?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-866: - Fix Version/s: 2.2 Multi-level skipping on posting lists -