[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517184
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
Thanks for more test cases. I guess the biggest problem here is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517233
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
To be precise -- I'm not 100% sure that this is a bug in JavaCC
OK, I think all the binding votes are for adopting JDK 1.5 with the
following plan:
1. Put in any new deprecations we want, cleanups, etc.
2. Release 2.4 so all of Mike M's goodness is available to 1.4 users
within the next 2 months or so (no hard date) using our new release
mechanism (i.e
H ... just a nit (or did I miss something?) in (2), do you mean 2.3?
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:29 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Migrate Lucene to JDK 1.5 for 3.0 release
OK, I think
yes. 2.3 then on to 2.9
On Aug 2, 2007, at 11:02 AM, Steven Parkes wrote:
H ... just a nit (or did I miss something?) in (2), do you mean
2.3?
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 5:29 AM
To:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-948:
--
Fix Version/s: 2.3
Writers on two machines over NFS can hit FNFE due to stale NFS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517339
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-966:
+1 for deprecating StandardAnalyzer, although it is a little weird
Chris Hostetter wrote:
is it just me, or does it seem like the base class versions of
getVersion(), isOptimized(), and isCurrent() in IndexReader should all
throw UnsupportedOperationException?
(it seems like ideally they should abstract, but that ship/API has sailed)
Hoss,
I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517342
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-966:
---
I like the name DefaultAnalyzer.
A faster JFlex-based
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517348
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-966:
These issues seem odd.
Both JavaCC and Flex match with the same rules:
1.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517358
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-966:
By the way...you can see one of the issues here:
OLD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517368
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-966:
When digging deeper into the issues of compatibility with the original
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517371
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
O -- only now I realized I made a really silly mistake :)
13 matches
Mail list logo
