The 17 MB bundle I provided is essentially the source plus dependencies,
the bulk of which is jars, mainly the compile-time dependency
gwt-dev-windows.jar weighing in at 10MB.
The built WAR file is only 1.5 meg.
The WAR file bundled with Jetty (as a convenience) is 8 meg.
It may be possible to
I agree that being backward compatible is important. But ... I also work at
a company that delivers search solutions to many customers. Sometimes,
customers are being told that a specific fix will require them to rebuild
their indexes. Customers can then choose whether to install the fix or not.
Ho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1071.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed.
> SegmentMerger doesn't set payload bit in new optimized code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1071:
--
Attachment: lucene-1071.patch
I'm going to commit this very soon.
> SegmentMerger doesn't set
SegmentMerger doesn't set payload bit in new optimized code
---
Key: LUCENE-1071
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1071
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affect
In working on LUCENE-1001, things are getting a bit complicated with
loading payloads in overlapping spans (which causes the dreaded Can't
load payload more than once error).
This got me thinking about why we need the rule that payloads can only
be loaded once. I forget the reasoning behin
Yes, didn't mean jar, meant zip...or tar.
I guess this may not be a sticky point for most people.
For me, I just get knee jerk seeing the dist size quadruple for a
feature, that is in reality a very small part of the dist.
I am not arguing against adding it, just noting my stomach drop. Take
Mark Miller wrote:
My only concern is with the size increase this will give to the Lucene
jar. Another 17 meg - yikes!
You mean the release tar file, not the jar, right? Is the size of the
release really an issue for folks?
Doug
-
Compiled and ran it on Vista. Very cool. I am also a huge GWT fan.
This is a great start. Only issue I ran into was also the scrolling
issue when selecting the drive...but based on the TODO: comments, it
appears you have seen that.
Grant:
It doesn't ask permission to read your hard drive beca
Seriously cool!
On Nov 28, 2007, at 6:13 PM, markharw00d wrote:
Any takers to test this contrib layout before I commit it?
http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/webluke.zip
This is a (17MB) zip file which you can unzip to a new "webluke"
directory under your copy of lucene/contrib and then r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546485
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-588:
--
True... a solution might be to have the queryparser map escaped chars to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546478
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-588 at 11/28/07 3:27 PM:
---
The problem is tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546479
]
Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-588:
-
Also, the original report and my comment look confusing because Jira remov
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546478
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-588 at 11/28/07 3:27 PM:
---
The problem is tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546478
]
Daniel Naber commented on LUCENE-588:
-
The problem is that the WildcardQuery itself doesn't have a concept of esc
Any takers to test this contrib layout before I commit it?
http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/webluke.zip
This is a (17MB) zip file which you can unzip to a new "webluke"
directory under your copy of lucene/contrib and then run the usual
Lucene Ant build ( or at least "ant build-contrib").
Y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546420
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-584:
--
Yes you're right, I ran the tests w/ code coverage analysis enabled, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546393
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
With the full patch applied, the following test cases use a BitSetMatcher:
: Thanks to Shai Erera for traslating the discussion into the developers'
: list. I am surprised about Chris Hostetter's response, as this issue was
to clarify: i'm not saying that the current behavior is ideal, or even
correct -- i'm saying the current behavior is the current behavior, and
c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546353
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1061:
---
Yonik,
I remember that we talked briefly about a QueryFactory in Atl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546352
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1044:
--
> I think deprecating flush(), renaming it to commit()
+1 That's clea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546312
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
{quote}
When autoCommit is true, then we should periodicall
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546309
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
I modified the CFS sync case to NOT bother syncing the fil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546306
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1044:
--
> But must every "automatic buffer flush" by IndexWriter really be a
"p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546304
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1026:
-
Hey Shai,
These fixes are great and I will incorporate them all.
I work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546301
]
Mike Baroukh commented on LUCENE-1070:
--
I agree that nobody is forced to use DateTools.
I used my own version,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1026:
---
Attachment: IndexAccessorFactory.java
> Provide a simple way to concurrently access a Lucene index f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1026:
---
Attachment: shai-IndexAccessor.zip
> Provide a simple way to concurrently access a Lucene index from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1026:
---
Attachment: (was: IndexAccessorFactory.java)
> Provide a simple way to concurrently access a Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546288
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1026:
Hi
I've downloaded the code and tried to run the tests, but I think there a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1070?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546284
]
Alexei Dets commented on LUCENE-1070:
-
I'm not a Lucene developer but just wanted to comment from a user perspec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1058:
Attachment: LUCENE-1058.patch
Tee it is. And here I just thought you liked golf! I guess
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546277
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1044:
{quote}
I'm confused. The semantics of commit should be tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546274
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1058:
--
The SinkTokenizer name could make sense, but I think TeeTokenFilter mak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1058:
Attachment: LUCENE-1058.patch
Whew. I think we are there and I like it!
I renamed Yoni
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546255
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1058:
-
Will do. Patch to follow shortly
> New Analyzer for buffering t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546236
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-794:
Michael: I would love to take a look. I've got the code you sent me and I wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-794?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546181
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-794:
-
Makes sense to commit it to me.
I want to spend some time reviewing this i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-584:
-
Attachment: lucene-584.patch
OK, here's a patch that compiles cleanly on current trunk and all te
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reassigned LUCENE-584:
Assignee: Michael Busch
> Decouple Filter from BitSet
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546166
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
The patch is backwards compatible, except for current subclasses of Filter
41 matches
Mail list logo
