[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550843
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1088:
If you're adding a wouldBeInserted method, I'd add a insertWithNoCheck that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-944:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3)
3.0
> Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-673.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Exceptions when using Lucene over NFS
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1088:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1088.patch
Attached patch. All tests pass. I plan to commit some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550710
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753:
---
OK my results on Win XP now agree with Yonik's.
On UNIX & OS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1044:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1044.take5.patch
Initial patch attached:
* Created new commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1087?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-1087:
-
Description:
Creating 2 different indexes, searching each individually and print score
details and com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550701
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753:
---
Thanks! I'll re-run.
{quote}
Well, at least we've learned th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-753:
Attachment: FileReadTest.java
OK, uploading latest version of the test that should fix ChannelTrans
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550687
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753:
---
Doh!! Woops :) I will rerun...
> Use NIO positional read to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550685
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-753:
-
I'll try fixing the transferTo test before anyone re-runs any tests.
> Us
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550682
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-753:
-
Mike, it looks like you are running with a bufsize of 6.5MB!
Apologies for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1088?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1088:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> PriorityQueue 'wouldBeInserted' method
> --
PriorityQueue 'wouldBeInserted' method
--
Key: LUCENE-1088
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1088
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Other
Repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550677
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753:
---
I also just ran a test with 4 threads, random access, on Linux
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550675
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-753:
---
I ran Yonik's most recent FileReadTest.java on the platforms b
On Dec 11, 2007 1:21 PM, Timo Nentwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:32:12 Shai Erera wrote:
> > For (1) - I can't explain it but I've run into documents with 0.0f scores.
> > For (2) - this is a simple logic - if the lowest score in the queue is 'x'
> > and you want to
On Tuesday 11 December 2007 14:32:12 Shai Erera wrote:
> For (1) - I can't explain it but I've run into documents with 0.0f scores.
> For (2) - this is a simple logic - if the lowest score in the queue is 'x'
> and you want to top docs only, then there's no point in attempting to
> insert a documen
Shai Erera wrote:
Hi,
I will open an issue and create the patch. One thing I'm not sure
of is the
wouldBeInserted method you mentioned - in what context should it be
used?
And ... lessThan shouldn't be public, it can stay protected.
Sorry, this is a method Peter suggested (see below) in
Hi,
I will open an issue and create the patch. One thing I'm not sure of is the
wouldBeInserted method you mentioned - in what context should it be used?
And ... lessThan shouldn't be public, it can stay protected.
On 12/11/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I think we can't
I think we can't make lessThan public since that would cause
subclasses to fail to compile (ie this breaks backwards compatibility)?
Adding "wouldBeInserted()" seems OK?
Mike
Peter Keegan wrote:
See my similar request from last March:
http://www.nabble.com/FieldSortedHitQueue-enhancement-
I agree that even though we don't see gains on the queries tested,
there are in theory cases where there could be a great many
allocations that would be saved.
I think we should do Shai's suggested option 1 (add the method and
change TDC to call it), change heap to be protected not privat
See my similar request from last March:
http://www.nabble.com/FieldSortedHitQueue-enhancement-to9733550.html#a9733550
Peter
On Dec 11, 2007 11:54 AM, Nadav Har'El <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Shai Erera wrote about "Performance Improvement for
> Search using PriorityQueue":
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Shai Erera wrote about "Performance Improvement for
Search using PriorityQueue":
> Hi
>
> Lucene's PQ implements two methods: put (assumes the PQ has room for the
> object) and insert (checks whether the object can be inserted etc.). The
> implementation of insert() requires
For (1) - I can't explain it but I've run into documents with 0.0f scores.
For (2) - this is a simple logic - if the lowest score in the queue is 'x'
and you want to top docs only, then there's no point in attempting to insert
a document with score lower than 'x' (it will not be added).
Maybe I did
Hi
I attached two patch files (for "java" and "test"). Due to a problem in my
checkout project in Eclipse, I don't have them under "src".
I also added a test and modified two tests in TestStandardAnalyzer.
On Dec 10, 2007 11:44 PM, Grant Ingersoll (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>[
> htt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1068?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-1068:
---
Attachment: StandardTokenizer-test-4.patch
StandardTokenizer-java-4.patch
Code fies
Hi!
Actually FuzzyQuery.rewrite() is pretty expensive so why not introduce a
caching decorator? A WeakHashMap with key==IndexReader and value==LRU of
BooleanQueries.
Timo
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additio
On Monday 10 December 2007 09:15:12 Paul Elschot wrote:
> The current TopDocCollector only allocates a ScoreDoc when the given
> score causes a new ScoreDoc to be added into the queue, but it does
I actually wrote my own HitCollector and now wonder about TopDocCollector:
public void collect(int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550419
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1081:
-
{quote}
I think we should resolve LUCENE-1085 first and move this to 2.4?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-1081:
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3)
2.4
Affects Version/s: (was: 2.3)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-944:
--
Lucene Fields: [Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
You are right, Grant.
I will r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1081?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550411
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1081:
---
I think we should resolve LUCENE-1085 first and move this to 2.4?
>
Hi
Back from the experiments lab with more results. I've used two indexes (1
and 10 million documents) and ran over the two 2000 queries. Each run was
executed 4 times and I paste here the average of the latest 3 (to eliminate
any caching that is done by the OS and to mimic systems that are alread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550376
]
Brian Pinkerton commented on LUCENE-753:
BTW, I think the performance win with Yonik's patch for some workloa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12550351
]
Brian Pinkerton commented on LUCENE-753:
Yeah, the file was full of zeroes. But I created the files w/o hole
36 matches
Mail list logo
