[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-472) Some fixes to let gcj build lucene using ant gcj target

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12560949#action_12560949 ] Michele Bini commented on LUCENE-472: - Obviously, I meant 2.3 instead of 2.4 ... Some

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.3.0 Take 2

Michael Busch wrote: Michael McCandless wrote: +1 Though, it looks like the binary cruft at the top of CHANGES.txt crept back in? OK, I removed the bytes from CHANGES.txt. Thanks! However, I don't think it's necessary to rebuild the artifacts?? Agreed. Mike

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-705) CompoundFileWriter should pre-set its file length

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-705: -- Attachment: LUCENE-705.patch Attached patch. All tests pass on OS X 10.4, Linux

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #344

Something went wrong with the Lucene build last night: HOME is set to / I think this build ran as user root when normally it should run as user hudson, which caused it to not run the right path for ant. Mike Hudson Apache Zone wrote: See

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1145: Attachment: TestScorerPerformance.java DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

Re: DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak maybe?

I have created Jira issue with this, [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] The only question for me here is if this policy of do not touch disk in Scorer constructor should stay. Actually an IOException that

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1145: Attachment: DisjunctionSumScorerOptimization.patch DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1145) DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak

DisjunctionSumScorer small tweak Key: LUCENE-1145 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1145 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Search Environment: all

Re: Back Compatibility

Me too... On Jan 18, 2008, at 4:33 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote: Sort of keeping all version in the trunk at once? IndexWriter2 is IndexWriter with some some features replaced with something better? And then IndexWriter3..? That's a bit messy if you ask me. But it would work. But terrible messy.

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.3.0 Take 2

Hi, just a reminder: this is a NEW vote. We canceled the first vote because with LUCENE-1144 an issue came up that is now fixed in the artifacts. So far we have one binding +1 vote from Mike. We need two more votes from PMC members before 2.3.0 can be released. The vote will continue at least

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #345

See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/345/changes Changes: [mikemccand] LUCENE-1139: fix IndexWriter settings (compound, merge.factor, etc.) to work again -- [...truncated 1433 lines...] A