OK, this vote has passed. I will open an issue and provide a patch.
-Grant
On Jul 30, 2008, at 8:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
As they say, rules are meant to be broken...
For a variety of reasons, some outlined below, I (and others) would
like us to break our back compatibility requiremen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219:
Attachment: LUCENE-1219.take3.patch
- updated this patch to apply to trunk
- implemented abstract getBina
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1327:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.3.1)
(was: 3.0)
(was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1310?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619339#action_12619339
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1310:
-
Committed to trunk.
I was wondering if this sh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1348?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-1348:
Attachment: LUCENE-1348.patch
> TestTimeLimitedCollector shuold not fail if the testing machine h
TestTimeLimitedCollector shuold not fail if the testing machine happens to be
slow
---
Key: LUCENE-1348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1348
Project: L
I checked back - this test fails about once a month.
Not too bad, bust still noise.
I don't like it - tests that fail occasionally hurt attitude to the
project's testing as a whole.
I'll create an issue for handling this.
Doron
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Apache Hudson Server <
[EMAIL PROTECT
