[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1333) Token implementation needs improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621101#action_12621101 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1333: OK since you pulled it all togeth

Re: Re[4]: lucene scoring

The only score that I can think of that can measure "quality" across different queries are invariant scores such as pagerank. That is to score the document on its general information value and then use that as a filter regardless of the query. This is very different than the problem of trying to no

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621099#action_12621099 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1219: bq. realized I am missing actual

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-753) Use NIO positional read to avoid synchronization in FSIndexInput

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-753?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621091#action_12621091 ] Matthew Mastracci commented on LUCENE-753: -- bq. Is the index itself corrupt, ie, N

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1333) Token implementation needs improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1333?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] DM Smith updated LUCENE-1333: - Attachment: LUCENE-1333.patch This patch includes all the previous ones. Note: It includes the function

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1350) Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] DM Smith updated LUCENE-1350: - Attachment: LUCENE-1350.patch {quote} Should we just absorb this issue into LUCENE-1333? DM, of your lis

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621043#action_12621043 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1219: -- bq. Also ... it'd be nice to have a way to do

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1350) Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621041#action_12621041 ] doronc edited comment on LUCENE-1350 at 8/8/08 1:18 PM: - Mike,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1350) Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621041#action_12621041 ] Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1350: - Mike, thanks for clearing things... You're rig

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621036#action_12621036 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1219: - bq. could we instead add this to Field: byte[] binaryVa

Re: Re[2]: lucene scoring

Following suggestion is weaker than the requested functionality, but maybe you'll find the concept useful to ignore so called "garbage" results. Assume that the query is a simple OR query made of a few words. By examining the frequencies of these words in the index (their DFs) devise a synthetic d

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1329) Remove synchronization in SegmentReader.isDeleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12621024#action_12621024 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1329: -- bq. I didn't do this one yet ... it makes me

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1329) Remove synchronization in SegmentReader.isDeleted

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1329: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1329.patch I took a first cut at creating an explicit read only I

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1350) Filters which are "consumers" should not reset the payload or flags and should better reuse the token

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1350?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12620970#action_12620970 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1350: It seems like there are three di

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12620960#action_12620960 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1219: Eks, could we instead add this to

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1219) support array/offset/ length setters for Field with binary data

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1219?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Eks Dev updated LUCENE-1219: Attachment: LUCENE-1219.extended.patch Mike, This new patch includes take3 and adds the following: Fiel

Re[4]: lucene scoring

Relevance ranking is an option but we still won't be able compare results. Lets say we have distributed searching - in this case top 10 from one server is not the same as those which are from another. Even worse we may get that in the resulting set a document with most top score is worse than ot

Re[2]: lucene scoring

Query independent means that the threshold should have the same relevance for all queries and discard found docs below it. Current scoring implementation doesn't give guaranties that, say two documents found in two queries and which got the same score 0.5 are of the same quality. I don't wan