: Anyone mind if I delete http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/GdataServer
: and all its children (this doesn't sound pretty)?
i'd leave it ... it's already got a clear note about not being in releases
starting with 2.3 ... no reason to remove decent docs about it if anybody
out there is using i
Anyone mind if I delete http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/GdataServer and all
its children (this doesn't sound pretty)?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTEC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1061:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Adding a factory to QueryParser to instantiate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1061:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1061.patch
OK reworked patch to subclass. I plan to commit in a
Its a matter of speed. Once you know the document matches the query, it
would in general, make no sense to keep looking unless you had a strong
reason to factor it into scoring. So I don't think it makes much sense
to modify...now adding new Span classes...
Is there any
general interest in mod
A more detailed explanation of the issue was posted about a year ago,
http://www.nabble.com/Possible-bug-in-SpanNearQuery-td10345758.html. I
couldn't find any signs of resolution.
As a brief summary, consider a field with these terms,
"two one one two"
An ordered SpanNearQuery,
spanNear([t
Contractor position in SSF (South San Francisco)
_
We are looking for excellent Java developer who loves solving difficult
problems. The Project itself is innovative and fun.
Required Qualifications:
- At least 5 years in J2EE development, in real demo-able projects
- Computer Scien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626345#action_12626345
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1061:
OK then let's take the subclassin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626344#action_12626344
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1335:
bq. Maybe we should take a closer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626253#action_12626253
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1061:
--
In this specific instance I think subclassing
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
If I'm understanding correctly...
What about a SinkTokenizer that is backed by a Reader/Field instead of
the current one that stores it all in a List? This is more or less the
use case for the Tee/Sink implementations, w/ the exception that we
didn't plan for the Sink
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1335?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626158#action_12626158
]
Ning Li commented on LUCENE-1335:
-
Maybe this should be a separate JIRA issue. In doWait()
If I'm understanding correctly...
What about a SinkTokenizer that is backed by a Reader/Field instead of
the current one that stores it all in a List? This is more or less
the use case for the Tee/Sink implementations, w/ the exception that
we didn't plan for the Sink being too large, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626142#action_12626142
]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] edited comment on LUCENE-1142 at 8/27/08 7:51 AM:
Hi all,
I recently had a situation where I had to pass some metadata information
to Analyzer. This metadata was specific to a Document instance (short
story is that the analysis of some fields depended on data coming from
other fields, and the number of possible values was too big to use
sepa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626142#action_12626142
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1142:
--
I just tried updating Solr... I guess this is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626102#action_12626102
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1327:
-
Not an exact dupe by the way (spans vs scorer),
Looks like a link comment doesn't go to the mailing list. From JIRA:
I found the issue this one dupes. It looks to me like relaxing the spec
is the most likely fix. I don't know if that solves this guys problem
though - is calling isPayloadAvailable good enough, or is his logic
screwed up as a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626086#action_12626086
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1061:
I think the idea of sub-classing makes more sense
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626083#action_12626083
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1061:
-
> What's wrong with just subclassing Qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626081#action_12626081
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1061:
bq. What's wrong with just subcla
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626055#action_12626055
]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-1061:
--
What's wrong with just subclassing QueryParse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1293.
Resolution: Incomplete
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.4)
I think the explain me
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626052#action_12626052
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1126:
This patch looks reasonable? We
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626051#action_12626051
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1061:
This looks useful -- Michael or Y
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1327?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12626050#action_12626050
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1327:
This is indeed a bug in that the
26 matches
Mail list logo
