On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Michael McCandless <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This definitely makes sense -- there is an issue opened, with initial
> patch, to make programmatic access to CheckIndex possible, that may already
> cover this?
Hi,
Thanks for the information! It's
https://iss
Hi Paul,
It's unfortunate the code is larger than most contribs. The libraries
can be factored out. The next patch includes OceanDatabase. The
Ocean package and class names can be removed in favor of "realtime"?
> - There is a whole package of logging in there, but there's no logging
> in luc
Hi Grant,
I think the way to integrate with SOLR and Lucene is if people who are
committers to the respective projects work with me (if they want) on
the integration which will make it fairly straightforward as it was
designed and intended to be.
Cheers,
Jason
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Gra
Hello Shalin,
When I tried to integrate before it seemed fairly simple. However the
Ocean core code wasn't quite up to par yet so that needed work. It
will help to work with SOLR people directly who can figure how they
want to integrate such as yourself. Right now I'm finishing up the
OceanData
Op Saturday 06 September 2008 18:53:39 schreef Shalin Shekhar Mangar:
...
>
> The features are more important than the code but it will of course
> help a lot too. I think a good starting point for us (Lucene/Solr
> folks) would be to study Ocean's source and any documentation that
> you can provid
On Sep 6, 2008, at 4:36 AM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Regarding real-time search and Solr, my feeling is the focus should
be on first adding real-time search to Lucene, and then we'll figure
out how to incorporate that into Solr later.
I've read Jason's Wiki as well. Actually, I had to read
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, Timo Nentwig wrote:
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 13:27:59 +0100
From: Timo Nentwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Caching FuzzyQuery
Hi!
Actually FuzzyQuery.rewrite() is pretty expensive so why not introduce a
c
Hi Jason,
I think this is a misunderstanding. I only want to add these features
incrementally so that users can use them as soon as possible, rather than
delay them to a later release by re-architecting (which may take more time
and shift our focus from our users).
The features are more important
I cannot agree more with Otis. Its all about exposure! Without references
from main JavaDocs, some cool things in contrib just remain in obscurity.
-- Joaquin
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Regarding SSS (and any other contrib visibility).
> Perhap
Hi Yonik,
I fully agree with "good for projects in the long term". I just
figured it would be best if someone went ahead and built the things
and they could be integrated later into other projects, that's why I
checked them into Apache as patches. Sounds like a few folks like
Shalin and Noble wo
There's a good percent of the Solr community that is looking to add
everything you are (from a functional point of view). Some of the
other little things that we haven't considered (like a remote Java
API) sound cool... no reason not to add that also. We're also
planning on adding alternatives to
Hi Otis,
LUCENE-1313 is realtime search. The Ocean name should be removed from
it but I was not sure "realtime search" is what the technical name
should be at the time. I have seen it used elsewhere (such as at
Summize the search company Twitter recently purchased, Bebo, LinkedIn)
now and so bel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628857#action_12628857
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1151:
bq. Please indulge me a couple of
Regarding real-time search and Solr, my feeling is the focus should be on first
adding real-time search to Lucene, and then we'll figure out how to incorporate
that into Solr later.
I've read Jason's Wiki as well. Actually, I had to read it a number of times
to understand bits and pieces of it
Regarding SSS (and any other contrib visibility).
Perhaps we should get into habit of referencing contrib goodies from highly
visible (to developers) spots (no pun intended), like Javadocs. Concretely, if
SSS is so good or if it is simply one possible alternative Similarity that's
available and
15 matches
Mail list logo