Woops you're right. I'll add it.
Mike
Ning Li wrote:
LUCENE-1335 is not listed in CHANGES.txt? It also includes a minor
behavior change: "no longer allow the same Directory to be passed into
addIndexes* more than once".
Cheers,
Ning
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632837#action_12632837
]
Jay Es commented on LUCENE-427:
---
Yes, the patch works for the PrefixQuery class. I guess ther
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632837#action_12632837
]
Jay Es commented on LUCENE-427:
---
Yes, the patch works for the PrefixQuery class. I guess ther
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632833#action_12632833
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-427:
-
Jay, does the attached patch solve your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632833#action_12632833
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-427:
-
Jay, does the attached patch solve your
LUCENE-1335 is not listed in CHANGES.txt? It also includes a minor
behavior change: "no longer allow the same Directory to be passed into
addIndexes* more than once".
Cheers,
Ning
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just created the first
This also looks very useful -- thanks. (RAT stands for Release Audit
Tool).
Mike
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
You might also be interested in RAT. SOLR-762 has a patch for what
I hooked into Solr.
On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Hi,
I just created the first releas
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632823#action_12632823
]
Gunnar Wagenknecht commented on LUCENE-1344:
I'll collect feedback on the deve
Hi Lucene Developers,
Issue 1344 requests to make the Lucene JAR an OSGi bundle. The approach
proposed is to add the OSGi specific meta data into the MANIFEST.MF of
the existing Maven artifacts.
I prepared a patch which proposes a different approach. Instead of
adding the headers into the Maven J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632810#action_12632810
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1344:
Thanks Gunnar.
Can you and Nicol
You might also be interested in RAT. SOLR-762 has a patch for what I
hooked into Solr.
On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:29 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Hi,
I just created the first release candidate for 2.4, here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4rc1
Please download the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gunnar Wagenknecht updated LUCENE-1344:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1344.patch
I've updated the patch to include more descriptors for
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
How does column stride fields work for StringIndex field caching?
I'm not sure -- Michael Busch is working on column-stride fields.
I
have been working on the tag index which may be more suitable for
field caching and makes range queries faster. It is something that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632721#action_12632721
]
Ryan McKinley commented on LUCENE-1387:
---
I'm struggling to get two of the existing t
Ugh.
I'll commit it!
Mike
Karl Wettin wrote:
403 access denied :(
Index: package.html
===
--- package.html(revision 697120)
+++ package.html(arbetskopia)
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
Mileage may vary depending on term sat
403 access denied :(
Index: package.html
===
--- package.html(revision 697120)
+++ package.html(arbetskopia)
@@ -56,6 +56,8 @@
Mileage may vary depending on term saturation.
+
+
Populated with a single documen
Not quite, because how positions are encoded depends on whether any
payload appeared in that segment.
However, if 1) the input is a SegmentReader (since in general we can
merge any IndexReader), and 2) its format is "congruent" with the
format we are writing (ie both don't or do use the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1392.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Committed revision 697119 (2.4) and 69
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632706#action_12632706
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1390:
-
bq. The Extended-C and D blocks also have relev
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1394.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Committed revision 697114.
> Include
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1395.
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Availa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1395:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Fix Version/
I agree it makes sense to get this into 2.4.
Yes I'll roll an RC2 soon, with all the little fixes pending on 2.4:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310110&fixfor=12312681
I'm not certa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrzej Bialecki updated LUCENE-1396:
--
Attachment: phraseQuery.patch
This patch improves toString(), and adds a unit test.
G
Improve PhraseQuery.toString()
--
Key: LUCENE-1396
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1396
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Search
Affects Versions: 2.4, 2.9
There is going to be an rc2, right?
A couple of people have asked me questions about the performance of
InstantiatedIndex (via private mail and on the freenode #lucene
channel). They have tried to use it as a replacement for RAMDirectory
when it has been a rather large corpora. There is a g
I'm looking at the for loop in SegmentMerger.java at line 666,
which completely interprets the input positions/payloads for
an input term at a document.
The positions/payloads don't change when they merged, is that correct?
I'm wondering whether this loop could be replaced by a direct copy from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1395:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1395.patch
> Javadoc mistake in SegmentMerger
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1395:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1395.patch
> Javadoc mistake in SegmentMerger
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1395:
-
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1395.patch)
> Javadoc mistake in SegmentMerger
> --
Javadoc mistake in SegmentMerger
Key: LUCENE-1395
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1395
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Reporter: Paul E
FWIW, here's a simple bash function to do it too:
function sign-artifacts()
{
gpg --armor --output $1-$2.pom.asc --detach-sig $1-$2.pom
if [ -f $1-$2-javadoc.jar ]; then
gpg --armor --output $1-$2-javadoc.jar.asc --detach-sig $1-
$2-javadoc.jar
fi
if [ -f $1-$2-sour
Hi Mike,
How does column stride fields work for StringIndex field caching? I
have been working on the tag index which may be more suitable for
field caching and makes range queries faster. It is something that
would be good to integrate into core Lucene as well. It may be more
suitable for many
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Mike,
The other issue that will occur that I addressed is the field caches.
The underlying smaller IndexReaders will need to be exposed because of
the field caching. Currently in ocean realtime search the individual
readers are searched on using a MultiSearcher in orde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1394?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1394:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1394.patch
> Include all CHANGES.txt under contrib
>
Include all CHANGES.txt under contrib
-
Key: LUCENE-1394
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1394
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Build
Affects Versions: 2.4
Indeed.
It seems like this patch resolves it -- I'll open an issue:
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 696743)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
includes="${final.name}.jar,${demo.war.name}
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632648#action_12632648
]
Jay Es commented on LUCENE-427:
---
I just discovered this bug and I wonder if it will ever be r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632648#action_12632648
]
Jay Es commented on LUCENE-427:
---
I just discovered this bug and I wonder if it will ever be r
Lucene's nightly Hudson builds don't have svn version in MANIFEST.MF
Key: LUCENE-1393
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1393
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Ty
The release only contains the /CHANGES.txt. I think the CHANGES.txt
in /contrib and one in /contrib/benchmark
should be in there too.
karl
18 sep 2008 kl. 20.29 skrev Michael McCandless:
Hi,
I just created the first release candidate for 2.4, here:
http://people.apache.org/~mikem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12632593#action_12632593
]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-1344:
-
bq. Nicholas, we generate different JAR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gunnar Wagenknecht updated LUCENE-1344:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1344.patch
Michael, the attached patch adds the bundle license he
43 matches
Mail list logo
