[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656206#action_12656206
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/12/08 6:35 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656206#action_12656206
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/12/08 6:03 PM:
---
Hello,
In trying to figure out the best way to have a system for realtime whereby
the deletedDocs do not need to be saved there are two possible methods,
1) setting the DocIdBitSet manually (which breaks the saving and things,
but does not require doing norms cloning), or 2) implementing
IndexRead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656206#action_12656206
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/12/08 4:32 PM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656206#action_12656206
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Okay, but how am I going to squeeze between two
Doug Cutting:
> Folks are discussing whether generics are a special case for
> back-compatibility. This is an important discussion, since major
> releases are defined by their back-compatibility. This discussion thus
> should have priority over the discussion of new 3.0 features.
Okeedoke.
EdgeNGramTokenFilter stops on tokens smaller then minimum gram size.
Key: LUCENE-1491
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1491
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656150#action_12656150
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-831:
>> Building the docID -> ord array is stra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656144#action_12656144
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
> What is the ord of bana
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656136#action_12656136
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1483:
--
segment 1 has terms: apple, banana, orange
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tim Sturge updated LUCENE-1487:
---
Attachment: FieldCacheTermsFilter.java
Reformatted version. I'm happy to change the name if that's t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656132#action_12656132
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
OK, here's another tweak on the l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch
LUCENE-1314.patch
- Added TestIndexReaderCloneNorms becau
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
Decoupling IndexReader would for 3.0 would be great. This includes
making public SegmentReader, MultiSegmentReader.
A constructor like new SegmentReader(TermsDictionary termDictionary,
TermPostings termPostings, ColumnStrideFields csd, DocIdBitSet deletedDocs);
Where
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656089#action_12656089
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 12/12/08 10:24 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656089#action_12656089
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. Oh, here's another idea: do separate pqueue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1378:
-
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Affects Version/s:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1378?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-1378:
-
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Affects Version/s: 2
Decoupling IndexReader would for 3.0 would be great. This includes making
public SegmentReader, MultiSegmentReader.
A constructor like new SegmentReader(TermsDictionary termDictionary,
TermPostings termPostings, ColumnStrideFields csd, DocIdBitSet deletedDocs);
Where each class is abstract and c
On Dec 12, 2008, at 10:13 AM, Karl Wettin wrote:
Everything worked great when I switched from svn.eu.apache.org to
svn.apache.org. I suppose I should report that to someone. Infra?
Yes. Infra.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656079#action_12656079
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
> It would be better to p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656073#action_12656073
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1483:
--
> public abstract void setBase(int base);
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656071#action_12656071
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1473:
--
> Therefore the patch is to be taken as contr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656043#action_12656043
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1487:
--
I think the name should be different since it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656040#action_12656040
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
as soon as I figure out how to invoke the ICU R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1486:
-
Attachment: (was: TestComplexPhraseQuery.java)
> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1486:
-
Attachment: (was: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java)
> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase queries
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1486:
-
Attachment: ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java
Added support for "Nots" in phrase queries e.g. "-not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Harwood updated LUCENE-1486:
-
Attachment: TestComplexPhraseQuery.java
More tests for Nots
> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin closed LUCENE-1462.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed in r726030 and r 725837.
> Instantiated/IndexWriter discrepanies
>
Everything worked great when I switched from svn.eu.apache.org to
svn.apache.org. I suppose I should report that to someone. Infra?
12 dec 2008 kl. 00.13 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
http://www.nabble.com/Committing-new-files-to-(write-through-proxy)-slave-repo-fails---400-Bad-Request-td20083914.ht
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1466?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1466:
---
Description:
This proposes to import CharFilter that has been introduced in Solr 1.4.
Ple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656016#action_12656016
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
bq. We could simply offer both ("collect into s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656014#action_12656014
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Yeah, ugg. This is the nature o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656007#action_12656007
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Bah. You can't share that queue and get the reo
See also http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/Java_1.5_Migration
On Dec 12, 2008, at 7:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
We agreed in the vote that we would allow generics, etc. in 3.0
including the removal of non-generic versions of the same methods.
In other words, we aren't strictly following
IIRC, we also agreed that we didn't feel any compelling reason to make
a sweeping change to generics, but would likely just add them as we
see 'em, unless of course someone wants to do a wholesale patch. In
the case of generics, I see no reason why we can't intro them over
time, people usi
We agreed in the vote that we would allow generics, etc. in 3.0
including the removal of non-generic versions of the same methods. In
other words, we aren't strictly following the way we went from 1.9 to
2.0.
I sent a thread on 2.9/3.0 planning a while ago, but got no responses...
On Dec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655996#action_12655996
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
I've got a quick idea I want to try to fix it.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655988#action_12655988
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-831:
---
{quote}
> At present, KS only cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655984#action_12655984
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Ugg...you know I was afraid of that when I was
I can certainly see the benefit/temptation of the alternative "big
bang" approach.
It's just not clear to me (yet) which way (big bang or not) we're
planning to go, with 3.x.
Mike
Shai Erera wrote:
I wonder why do we even have to deprecate ...
A method like public void function( List l
I wonder why do we even have to deprecate ...
A method like public void function( List list ) changes nothing in
terms of API. When people will move to 3.0, they'll have to change their JDK
anyway to 5 (if they haven't already done so). Which means they had code
like:
function(List), and where List
Ryan McKinley wrote:
On Dec 12, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Taking this to java-dev (off Jira)...
Mark Miller (Jira) wrote:
> I thought there were some that wanted to change some of the API
to java
> 5 for the 3.0 release, cause I thought back compat was less
restricte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655976#action_12655976
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Duh: I just realized that when we
On Dec 12, 2008, at 5:18 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Taking this to java-dev (off Jira)...
Mark Miller (Jira) wrote:
> I thought there were some that wanted to change some of the API to
java
> 5 for the 3.0 release, cause I thought back compat was less
restricted
> 2-3. I guess mabye t
Michael McCandless wrote:
Taking this to java-dev (off Jira)...
Mark Miller (Jira) wrote:
> I thought there were some that wanted to change some of the API to java
> 5 for the 3.0 release, cause I thought back compat was less restricted
> 2-3. I guess mabye that won't end up happening, if it w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1486:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
(Added 2.9 fix version in addition to 2.4.1).
> Wildcards, ORs e
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655963#action_12655963
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1483:
---
{quote}bq. adding a return type to the coll
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655957#action_12655957
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. adding a return type to the c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655955#action_12655955
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
Mark, I got on hunk (HitCollector
Taking this to java-dev (off Jira)...
Mark Miller (Jira) wrote:
> I thought there were some that wanted to change some of the API to java
> 5 for the 3.0 release, cause I thought back compat was less restricted
> 2-3. I guess mabye that won't end up happening, if it was going to, it
> seems we'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1490:
---
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
Fix Version/
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655944#action_12655944
]
Wolf Siberski commented on LUCENE-1473:
---
Thanks to Doug and Jason for your construct
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1487:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> FieldCacheTermsFilter
> -
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655942#action_12655942
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1487:
I think this is a useful filter i
56 matches
Mail list logo
