[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664404#action_12664404
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1316:
--
In a way, this is a mirror image of Jason's r
Does anyone know the maximum boost factor value for a field in Lucene?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Maximum-boost-factor-tp21492116p21492116.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions!
Am new to Lucene...would appreciate if u could elaborate ur following point
with an example:
> Add a separate field, say "days", in which you will put as many "1" as
> many days elapsed since the epoch (not neccessarily since 1 Jan 1970 -
> pick a date that mak
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1314:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch
All tests pass
Changed DirectoryIndexReader. acquireWrite
I am working on a job portal site and have been using Lucene for job search
functionality.
Users will be posting a number jobs on our site on a daily basis.We need to
make sure that new job posted is searchable on the site as soon as possible.
In this context, how do I update Lucene index when a n
OOM erros with CheckIndex with indexes containg a lot of fields with norms
--
Key: LUCENE-1520
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1520
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664306#action_12664306
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-505:
--
Mike: I created new issue LUCENE-1520 and adde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664295#action_12664295
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-505:
---
bq. CheckIndex opens and then tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664290#action_12664290
]
thetaphi edited comment on LUCENE-505 at 1/15/09 2:19 PM:
---
{q
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664290#action_12664290
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-505:
--
{quote}
bq. In my opinion the problem with lar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664280#action_12664280
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-505:
---
bq. In my opinion the problem with l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664276#action_12664276
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1316:
I think at least AllTermDocs.java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664272#action_12664272
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-505:
--
In my opinion the problem with large indexes i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664271#action_12664271
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314:
{quote}
> Previously on a clone,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664265#action_12664265
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1314:
Jason I think TestIndexReaderClon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-505?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664255#action_12664255
]
Shon Vella commented on LUCENE-505:
---
Without this sort of change, searching a large index
On 01/14/2009 at 10:44 PM, mitu2009 wrote:
> Is it possible to bubble up newer records in lucene search results? ie.I
> want Lucene to give a higher score to records which are closer to
> today's date.
In addition to the fine ideas given by previous posters, Andrzej Bialecki has
described a techn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664083#action_12664083
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1476:
I think it's fine to expose this
BTW, for future reference, this question is better suited to the java-
user list...
There are actually various ways to do this. First question is how to
store the info... you can use payloads (as Shai describes), or a
simple stored field, or single-term index & load through FieldCache.
Second
No default behavior of Lucene does this.
My approach is to create a time weight query with a scorer that weighs in
the time based on a user-defined formula. This way, you can view the
explained query with the time weighting information, and the weighting can
be dynamically controlled.
This is a b
Hey,
I'm not familiar w/ an out-of-the-box feature like that in Lucene, but what
you could do is:
1. Add to each document a field, let's say "datepld" by using the
d.add(new Field("datepld", TokenStream)).
2. Write a special TokenStream which its next() methods add a single,
fixed, te
21 matches
Mail list logo
