Hi all,
I am new to Lucene and I need to know the following:
In case I have indexed some data using Lucene and it contains the fields:
Location, City, Country.
Suppose the data is as follows in the index in each of the above fields:
1) R G Heights
2) London
3) United Kindom
If i try to
One more just for a check with much fewer unique terms (20k). Didn't
catch that I didnt clamp down enough on the uniques last one. Back up to
21 segments this time, same wildcard search, 7718 hits, and the new
method is still approx 20% faster than the old. The last run was 16
segments though w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664984#action_12664984
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 1/18/09 8:20 PM:
Man, I'm not paying attention. I switched the analyzer but didnt take it
off UNANALYZED. Here are the correct results. Its actually only like
20-30% faster for the index I used. So a lot of that could be the gains
that we were seeing in general anyway. Perhaps a bit more too though.
Still a tot
Oh yeah, thats a constantscore wildcard query.
Mark Miller wrote:
Just checked it out, and its not a bad win on multi term queries. Its
not the same exponential gain as field cache loading, but I bet lots
of 2-3x type stuff. You appear to save a decent amount by not applying
every term to each
Just checked it out, and its not a bad win on multi term queries. Its
not the same exponential gain as field cache loading, but I bet lots of
2-3x type stuff. You appear to save a decent amount by not applying
every term to each segment because of the logarithmic sizing.
My query of: new Wildc
On Friday 09 January 2009 22:30:14 Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:11:31PM +0100, Karl Wettin wrote:
>
> > SSD is pretty close to RAM when it comes to seeking. Wouldn't that
> > mean that a bitset stored on an SSD would be more or less as fast as a
> > bitset in RAM?
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12665008#action_12665008
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
Okay, I think I have it. I tried to count the t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664984#action_12664984
]
markrmil...@gmail.com edited comment on LUCENE-1483 at 1/18/09 2:19 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller resolved LUCENE-1124.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks! Committed.
> short circuit FuzzyQuery.rewrite when input token length
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664988#action_12664988
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
{quote}
In fact this probably cau
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664984#action_12664984
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
My previous results had a few oddities going wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664983#action_12664983
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1483:
--
bq. think the massive slowness of iterating t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664979#action_12664979
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. Even still, you are seeing l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1314?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1314:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1314.patch
New patch attached. All tests pass. Changes:
* S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664965#action_12664965
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-
I think its pretty costly even for non id type
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12664948#action_12664948
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. As we call next on MultiTerm
17 matches
Mail list logo
