See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/720/changes
Changes:
[mikemccand] LUCENE-1483: switch to newly added MultiReaderHitCollector for all
core collectors, that is aware of segment transitions during searching, to
improve performance of searching and warming
[uschindler] I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667917#action_12667917
]
Jason Bennett commented on LUCENE-1484:
---
Is there any chance this patch could be rel
Hi,
Javacc 4.2 is out, but the code generated by this version is different
than code generated by javacc 4.1,
which I think is the version used to generate the lucene queryparser files.
What is the official javacc version used when generating the queryparser
classes ?
Is it a good idea to s
Hi,
When looking through the All-Javadocs index generated on hudson, I have seen
some small bugs due to the new spatial contrib and the trie package. I
modified build.xml and site.xml (attached patch).
Can somebody with commit rights apply this?
Maybe, the spatial contrib should go into CHANGES.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667837#action_12667837
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1528:
Hi Michael,
I checked the book "Generating parse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667793#action_12667793
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1507:
New patch looks good, thanks Uwe.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1483.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Committed revision 738219. Thanks to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1507:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1507.patch
Hi Mike,
I just updated the patch a little bit to supply javadoc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667775#action_12667775
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. The only problem with paralle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667774#action_12667774
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
bq. since last Friday, we had no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667770#action_12667770
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1476:
bq. Perhaps this should be an opt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667762#action_12667762
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1507:
That looks great to me! I'll com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1507:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> adding EmptyDocIdSet/Iterator
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667755#action_12667755
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1483:
---
Jason: We should open a new issue for that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667752#action_12667752
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1483:
---
Hi Mike,
since last Friday, we had no probl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1507:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1507.patch
How about that patch? It just a static final for usage like this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667748#action_12667748
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1476:
-
> The percentage performance decrease i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667713#action_12667713
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476:
--
The percentage performance decrease i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1530.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available, New])
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667654#action_12667654
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1489:
--
It looks to me like this could be fixed in th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667645#action_12667645
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1507:
We could simply add a static meth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12667644#action_12667644
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1530:
bq. If nobody complains and the r
> Alternately, we could turn off the "Publish Javadoc" feature, and instead
> add trunk/build/docs/api to the list of files to "Archive" and then start
> refering to a URL like this (doesn't work at the moment) for all the
> javadocs...
>
> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/view/Lucene/job/Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1530?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1530:
--
Description:
TrieRangeQuery/Filter is missing one thing: Ranges that have exclusive bounds.
> Chris Hostetter wrote:
> > : > I think, the outdated docs should be removed from the server to also
> > : > disappear from search engines.
>
> We do not want unofficial builds to be indexed by search engines anyway.
> Folks who're searching for information about Lucene should not be
> referred
25 matches
Mail list logo
