See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/858/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Even non-API changes have tradeoffs... the indexing improvements (err,
total rewrite) made that code *much* harder to understand and debug.
It's a net win since the indexing performance improvements were so
fantastic.
I agree - very hard to follow, worth the improvements.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719188#action_12719188
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1630:
--
bq. We could simply declare, going forward, t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin resolved LUCENE-1578.
-
Resolution: Fixed
comitted
> InstantiatedIndex supports non-optimized IndexReaders
> --
oups, an error in the code. im on it.
13 jun 2009 kl. 23.54 skrev ka...@apache.org:
Author: kalle
Date: Sat Jun 13 21:54:07 2009
New Revision: 784481
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=784481&view=rev
Log:
LUCENE-1578: Support for loading unoptimized readers to the
constructor of Instanti
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719179#action_12719179
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1689:
--
bq. onik, I think the problem is where method
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719174#action_12719174
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Yonik, I think the problem is where method sign
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Yonik Seeley updated LUCENE-1689:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
bq. I am curious how you plan on approachin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719158#action_12719158
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
i forgot to answer your question Michael:
it
On Jun 13, 2009, at 8:58 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
moving stuff core stuff from Solr -> Lucene. So summing this all up:
* Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the core "expert" engine
used by Solr/Nutch/etc., so things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719146#action_12719146
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Simon, a response to your other comment 'I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719139#action_12719139
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
I am curious how you plan on approaching backwa
Of course consumability (good APIs) is important, but rational people
can disagree when it comes to the specifics... many things come with
tradeoffs.
Even non-API changes have tradeoffs... the indexing improvements (err,
total rewrite) made that code *much* harder to understand and debug.
It's a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719127#action_12719127
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Simon, I want to address your comment on perfor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719126#action_12719126
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Michael, I don't think it will be ready for 2.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719125#action_12719125
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
The scary thing is that this happens al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719123#action_12719123
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-
Michael: LowerCaseFilter doesn't incorrectly br
I accidentally send this to Yonik directly -- forwarding to mail list.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> Can something like AspectJ change the type of instantiated classes?
That is actually possible. An "around" advice and do that in a very
flexible way and I have thought of t
Very true write up Grant!
On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Michael
McCandless wrote:
> OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
> moving stuff core stuff from Solr -> Lucene. So summing this all up:
>
> * Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the core "expert" engine
>
OK, good points Grant. I now agree that it's not a simple task,
moving stuff core stuff from Solr -> Lucene. So summing this all up:
* Some feel Lucene should only aim to be the core "expert" engine
used by Solr/Nutch/etc., so things like moving trie to core (with
consumable naming, go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719115#action_12719115
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1486:
--
The primary reason (and perhaps not a particu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719109#action_12719109
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1488:
ICUAnalyzer looks very useful! G
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1684?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719107#action_12719107
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1684:
Thanks Marvin; I think the approa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719105#action_12719105
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1486:
Is there some reason not to inclu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1689:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.9
> supplementary character handling
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719104#action_12719104
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1689:
Robert, could you flesh this patc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719103#action_12719103
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1690:
This sounds good!
Could we inclu
27 matches
Mail list logo
