[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1566) Large Lucene index can hit false OOM due to Sun JRE issue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730704#action_12730704 ] Thulasi Ram Naidu P commented on LUCENE-1566: - any temporary solution for this

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1567) New flexible query parser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730653#action_12730653 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1567: - Hang on a sec - it sounds like the target was 1

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1742) Wrap SegmentInfos in public class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1742: - Attachment: LUCENE-1742.patch After looking at it, I wasn't sure why we couldn't simply

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1567) New flexible query parser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730641#action_12730641 ] Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1567: -- {quote} Ah, I also couldn't run "ant

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1742) Wrap SegmentInfos in public class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730640#action_12730640 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1742: -- In order for this class to be compati

Re: Lucene contrib build failing on jdk 1.4

Hi Mark, Thanks for the explanation, it makes sense now : ) Adriano Crestani Campos On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > Hey Adriano, > > Only core is fully 1.4. To build all of contrib you must use at least java > 1.5. If you want to build a contrib that is supposed to 1.4 wi

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1742) Wrap SegmentInfos in public class

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1742: - Component/s: Index Fix Version/s: 3.0 Priority: Trivial (was:

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1742) Wrap SegmentInfos in public class

Wrap SegmentInfos in public class -- Key: LUCENE-1742 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1742 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Reporter: Jason Rutherglen Wrap Segmen

Re: Lucene contrib build failing on jdk 1.4

Hey Adriano, Only core is fully 1.4. To build all of contrib you must use at least java 1.5. If you want to build a contrib that is supposed to 1.4 with 1.4, use the individual build file for that contrib. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Adriano Cres

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1567) New flexible query parser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730627#action_12730627 ] Adriano Crestani commented on LUCENE-1567: -- Ah, I also couldn't run "ant build-co

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1567) New flexible query parser

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1567?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Adriano Crestani updated LUCENE-1567: - Attachment: lucene_1567_adriano_crestani_07_13_2009.patch Hey guys, Here is a patch con

Lucene contrib build failing on jdk 1.4

Hi, I checked out Lucene java trunk and ran "build-contrib". When I run using Sun JDK 1.6.0_07 it builds successfully, but using Sun JDK 1.4.2_19 I get the error below. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks in advance, Adriano Crestani Campos ... build-artifacts-and-tests: bdb: BUILD FAILED /home

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730590#action_12730590 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1741: --- Javadocs state (in FileChannel#map): "For m

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730580#action_12730580 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1741: I'd be more comfortable w/ 256 MB

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730560#action_12730560 ] Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1741: - Uwe, you convinced me, I looked at the code, and indeed

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730551#action_12730551 ] Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-1741: An algorithm is nice if there are no specific set

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730547#action_12730547 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1741: --- OK, we have two patches, we can think about

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730543#action_12730543 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1741: --- Eks Dev wrote in java-dev: bq. I have no t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1712) Set default precisionStep for NumericField and NumericRangeFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730538#action_12730538 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1712: Patch looks good Uwe! > Set defa

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1712) Set default precisionStep for NumericField and NumericRangeFilter

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1712?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1712: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1712.patch Attached is a patch with the default precisionStep of 4. The jav

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1726) IndexWriter.readerPool create new segmentReader outside of sync block

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730424#action_12730424 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1726: -- I was thinking the sync on all of rea

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730378#action_12730378 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1741: Patch looks good! > Make MMapDir

Re: [jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

>I have no test data which size is good, it is just trying out Sure, for this you need bad OS and large index, you are not as lucky as I am to have it :) Anyhow, I would argument against default value. An algorithm is quite simple, if you hit OOM on map(), reduce this value until it fits :) n

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1741: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1741.patch Attached is a patch using the JRE_IS_64BIT in Constants. I set t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730373#action_12730373 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1741: --- Good idea. Do we have still this 64bit dete

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730368#action_12730368 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1741: Should we default the chunking si

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1741: -- Fix Version/s: (was: 3.1) 2.9 > Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user config

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1741: -- Attachment: LUCENE-1741.patch Patch that allows configuration of chunk size. I will commit in

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1741) Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts

Make MMapDirectory.MAX_BBUF user configureable to support chunking the index files in smaller parts --- Key: LUCENE-1741 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUC

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1693) AttributeSource/TokenStream API improvements

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1693?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730306#action_12730306 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1693: --- Mike implemented a nice idea to solve the p

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1678) Deprecate Analyzer.tokenStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730303#action_12730303 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1678: --- Your solution is also cool, to fix the last

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1678) Deprecate Analyzer.tokenStream

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1678?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1678: --- Attachment: LUCENE-1678.patch OK, inspired by Uwe's persistence on LUCENE-1693, I re

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-1566) Large Lucene index can hit false OOM due to Sun JRE issue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1566?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1566: -- Assignee: Simon Willnauer (was: Michael McCandless) Assigning this one back t

Re: Relevance's scores on TopFieldCollector/FieldComparator

It's odd that this was necessary. The ScoreCachingWrapperScorer simply wraps (and caches) the result from calling score(), per hit, so that if score() is called more than once we don't have to re-compute it. I don't understand why you were always seeing 0 score come back from it. Mike On Thu, J

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1740) Lucli: Command to change the Analyzer

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1740?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1740. Resolution: Fixed I just committed this. Thanks Bernd! > Lucli: Command to chang

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1726) IndexWriter.readerPool create new segmentReader outside of sync block

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12730272#action_12730272 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1726: {quote} I haven't really figured