[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-486.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 822139.
> Core Test should not have dependencies on the D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1711:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
> Field meta-data
> ---
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-965:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
3.1
> Implement a state-of-the-art retrieval fun
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1888?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1888:
--
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.0)
> Provide Option to Store Payloads on the Term Vector
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1458:
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch
eh - even if you have moved on, if I'm going to put up a patch, migh
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-486:
-
Attachment: lucene-486.patch
Will have to commit the change in TestDoc also to the compatibility
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1458:
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch
bq. I haven't "svn up"d to all the recent the deprecations removals
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762406#action_12762406
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1458:
-
I haven't followed too closely (even th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762387#action_12762387
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1636:
---
This change is also noted in the backwards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762386#action_12762386
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
{quote}
even the UIMA people were very happ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762375#action_12762375
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
I already promoted (and also Grant in his w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762330#action_12762330
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1946:
---
In case the change in our backwards-compati
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1698?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762329#action_12762329
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1698:
---
Now that 2.9 is out and 3.0 is close, I'd l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762292#action_12762292
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1458:
--
bq. I agree this would be useful. I did have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762290#action_12762290
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1910:
--
> 2 minutes to create a query based on 10,000
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762284#action_12762284
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1947:
-
We should actually add a comment in the files a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762282#action_12762282
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. 1) How many terms in a field?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1636?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762281#action_12762281
]
Mark Bennett commented on LUCENE-1636:
--
(trouble posting, forgive if duplicate)
This
I think we shouldn't discuss too many different things here.
To begin I'd just like to introduce the IndexConfig class, that will
hold the parameters we currently pass to the different IndexWriter
constructors.
If we later need to create different IndexWriter impls we can introduce
a factory.
On 10/05/2009 12:22 PM, Karl Wettin (JIRA) wrote:
Deprecating InstantiatedIndexWriter
---
Key: LUCENE-1948
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1948
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762253#action_12762253
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1947 at 10/5/09 9:48 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762253#action_12762253
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1947:
-
bq. I suppose this a misstake or possible due t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1948:
Attachment: LUCENE-1948.patch
> Deprecating InstantiatedIndexWriter
>
Deprecating InstantiatedIndexWriter
---
Key: LUCENE-1948
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1948
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
Components: contrib/*
Affects Versions: 2.9
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin updated LUCENE-1947:
Attachment: LUCENE-1947.patch
> Snowball package contains BSD licensed code with ASL header
>
Snowball package contains BSD licensed code with ASL header
---
Key: LUCENE-1947
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1947
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karl Wettin closed LUCENE-1939.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.0
Committed in 821888.
Thanks Patrick!
(I'll consider th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762224#action_12762224
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-1458:
---
Hi Yonik:
These are indeed useful features. L
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762203#action_12762203
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1458:
--
Sounding cool! I haven't had time to look at
> I think AS is overkill for conveying configuration of IW/IR?
Agree.
> It's too cumbersome, I think, for something that ought to be simple.
> I'd prefer a dedicated config class with strongly typed setters
> exposed. Of all the "pure syntax" options so far I'd still prefer the
> traditional "con
Michael McCandless wrote:
> I think AS is overkill for conveying configuration of IW/IR?
>
> Suddenly, instead of:
>
> cfg.setRAMBufferSizeMB(128.0)
>
> I'd have to do something like this?
>
>
> cfg.addAttribute(IndexWriterRAMBufferSizeAttribute.class).setRAMBufferSize(128.0)
>
> It's too cumb
Hi Mike,
> I think AS is overkill for conveying configuration of IW/IR?
>
> Suddenly, instead of:
>
> cfg.setRAMBufferSizeMB(128.0)
>
> I'd have to do something like this?
>
>
> cfg.addAttribute(IndexWriterRAMBufferSizeAttribute.class).setRAMBufferSize
> (128.0)
>
> It's too cumbersome, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1458:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1458.tar.bz2
LUCENE-1458-back-compat.patch
New pa
I think AS is overkill for conveying configuration of IW/IR?
Suddenly, instead of:
cfg.setRAMBufferSizeMB(128.0)
I'd have to do something like this?
cfg.addAttribute(IndexWriterRAMBufferSizeAttribute.class).setRAMBufferSize(128.0)
It's too cumbersome, I think, for something that ought to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762131#action_12762131
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1257:
-
bq. err... looks like perhaps its only hit once
> > See my second mail. The recently introduced Attributes and
> AttributeSource
> > would solve this. Each component just defines its attribute interface
> and
> > impl class and you pass in an AttributeSource as configuration. Then you
> can
> > do:
> >
> > AttributeSource cfg = new AttributeSour
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:01, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Marvin,
>
>> > Property names are always String, values any type (therefore
>> Map).
>> > With Java 5, integer props and so on are no "bad syntax" problem because
>> of
>> > autoboxing (no need to pass new Integer() or Integer.valueOf()).
>>
Hi Marvin,
> > Property names are always String, values any type (therefore
> Map).
> > With Java 5, integer props and so on are no "bad syntax" problem because
> of
> > autoboxing (no need to pass new Integer() or Integer.valueOf()).
>
> Argument validation gets to be a headache when you pass ar
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 08:27:20AM +0200, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Pass a Properties or Map to the ctor/open. The keys are predefined
> constants. Maybe our previous idea of an IndexConfiguration class is a
> subclass of HashMap with all the constants and some easy-to-use
> setter methods for very o
> > On Sun, Oct 04, 2009 at 05:53:14AM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote:
> >
> > > 1 Do we prevent config settings from changing after creating an
> > > IW/IR?
> >
> > Any settings conveyed via a settings object ought to be final if you
> want
> > pluggable index components. Otherwise, you ne
40 matches
Mail list logo
