[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1458: Attachment: LUCENE-1458.patch Here is my patch. I won't say its 100% polished and done, but I beli

Re: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #977

My fault... I hadn't created a new back-compat tag yet, because I'd thought I might commit another deprecation patch tonight. Will make the tag now... Michael On 10/12/09 8:04 PM, Apache Hudson Server wrote: See Changes: [

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #977

See Changes: [buschmi] LUCENE-1975: Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and generify Query.extractTerms(Set) [mikemccand] improve NRT javadocs -- [...truncated 15945 lines...] [j

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

SVN is about as good at merging branches as any of us are with a patch and trunk unfortunately. But that can still be somewhat more convenient than all these huge patches, with different people at different stages. Depends on how many people end up working on this though. Any more than 2, and I t

Re: [jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

I think it's supposed to work pretty good - though I have no personal experience with merging branches with svn. I think we should try it - then we'll know! :) Michael On 10/12/09 12:32 PM, Michael McCandless (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.at

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1975) Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and generify Query.extractTerms(Set)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch resolved LUCENE-1975. --- Resolution: Fixed Committed revision 824527. > Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and g

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-1975) Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and generify Query.extractTerms(Set)

Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and generify Query.extractTerms(Set) - Key: LUCENE-1975 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1975 Project: Lucene - Ja

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1975) Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and generify Query.extractTerms(Set)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1975?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-1975: -- Attachment: lucene-1975.patch All tests pass. > Remove deprecated SpanQuery.getTerms() and ge

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-944) Remove deprecated methods in BooleanQuery

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-944?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael Busch updated LUCENE-944: - Attachment: lucene-944.patch All core & contrib tests pass now. The problem was QueryUtils#check

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764831#action_12764831 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458: bq. pulsing isn't setup to work w

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764822#action_12764822 ] Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1458: - Havn't gotten that far yet ;) Still just doing

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764800#action_12764800 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458: bq. I dont see seek(ord) being ca

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764799#action_12764799 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458: bq. Shall we create a flexible-in

Re: Fix for Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, and moving into Contrib

Mark, I agree with what you said, it would be great if there was a way to easily enable this japanese support. I will let someone else comment on the licensing, but I since you mentioned source dictionaries, thought Sen only used IPA dic for its data? I could be wrong on this. I think its a BSD-l

Re: Fix for Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, and moving into Contrib

Hello Robert, That's a good question. The core SEN is under LGPL, yes. However, I didn't need to make changes to that, though given that there are 2 versions floating around, I think it needs a good home. But the glue-layer is under "Apache 2.0" license, and that's the part that needed fixing.

Re: Fix for Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, and moving into Contrib

Mark, does this mean Sen will be under the Apache license? (it is currently LGPL) On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 1:46 PM, Mark Bennett wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've been working to fix the Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, which is > currently hosted at: > https://sen.dev.java.net > > To review, Japan

Fix for Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, and moving into Contrib

Hi folks, I've been working to fix the Japanese SEN morphological analyzer, which is currently hosted at: https://sen.dev.java.net To review, Japanese doesn't use whitespace for word breaks. The traditional approach to CJK (Chinese, Japanese, Korean) is to use bigram character pairs in the index

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1458) Further steps towards flexible indexing

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12764737#action_12764737 ] Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1458: --- Shall we create a flexible-indexing branch