Hi Mike:
I have been playing with the patch, and I think I have some information
that you might like.
Let me spend sometime and gather some more numbers and update in jira.
Thanks
btw:
About the conversion on multi values fields, I am not sure I get it
(sorry for being
Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION is inlined in code compiled against Lucene JAR,
so version detection is incorrect
---
Key: LUCENE-2004
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2004:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2004.patch
See also: http://www.javaworld.com/community/node/3400
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-2004.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed.
Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION is inlined in code compiled
I found a solution for this problem!
First the explaination:
The test CheckIndexTest compares the version numbers from Constants with the
current compilation (ant settings). There are two constants
Constants.LUCENE_MAIN_VERSION which is hard coded into Constants.java. This
version had a problem,
Putting the LUCENE_VERSION in front of the string instead of in back seems fine?
Or we could relax the test to simply assert that the expected version
appears anywhere as a substring? (ie, .contains instead of
.startsWith)
Mike
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de
Putting the LUCENE_VERSION in front of the string instead of in back seems
fine?
I would prefer this, as it makes it possible to do compareTo() comparisons
and so on, which may be used in client code, too (not only test). OK, client
code should not use trunk versions from Hudson, but it would
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:17 AM, John Wang john.w...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been playing with the patch, and I think I have some information
that you might like.
Let me spend sometime and gather some more numbers and update in jira.
Excellent!
say bottom has ords 23, 45, 76,
OK let's do first!
Mike
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:31 AM, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Putting the LUCENE_VERSION in front of the string instead of in back seems
fine?
I would prefer this, as it makes it possible to do compareTo() comparisons
and so on, which may be used in client
Done!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2009 11:39 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768661#action_12768661
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1973:
---
Anybody wants to help?
Remove deprecated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-2001:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
wordnet parsing bug
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768695#action_12768695
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2001:
-
I'll take care of the branch.
wordnet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll resolved LUCENE-2001.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 828728.
wordnet parsing bug
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768700#action_12768700
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Why are new features going into 3.0? I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768705#action_12768705
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1606:
-
Grant, I thought it was ok from Uwe's comment:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768711#action_12768711
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2002:
-
I think we need more doc as well - stopfilter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768717#action_12768717
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2002:
-
{quote}Unfortunately, JavaCC generates
Add LuSql project to Apache Lucene - Contributions wiki page
--
Key: LUCENE-2005
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Task
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Glen Newton updated LUCENE-2005:
Description:
Add [LuSql|http://lab.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cistilabswiki/index.php/LuSql]
to
I have a field in called BookTitle. I want to loop through all the entries
without doing a search. I just want to get the list of BookTitle's that is
in this field:
I tried IndexReader but MaxDocs() doesnt work because it returns everything
and I have other fields in their which is allot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768727#action_12768727
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
glen, I know there is an oracle domain index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768733#action_12768733
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. Thus, I think, unfortunately,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768738#action_12768738
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. Many analyzers can use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768739#action_12768739
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1606:
---
3.0 is just the switch to 1.5 and generics.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768740#action_12768740
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2002:
-
{quote}
Or, with this issue I could add Version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768743#action_12768743
]
Glen Newton commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
[DBSight|http://www.dbsight.net/] is a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768744#action_12768744
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. Michael, if you do this, can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768745#action_12768745
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
Glen, I think it would be good to bring the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768747#action_12768747
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2002:
-
bq. Ahh yes indeed. Is there a corresponding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768746#action_12768746
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2005:
LuSql looks great! It'd be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768749#action_12768749
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
bq. LuSql looks great! It'd be wonderful to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768752#action_12768752
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. Michael, what about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1258?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1258.
Resolution: Duplicate
Dup of LUCENE-2002.
Increment position by default in
Hi,
What is the consensus on new features for contrib for Lucene 3.0? I know
that for core, its mostly a java 5 upgrade and deprecation removal.
I want to make sure LUCENE-1606 is set to the right version, but I figured
its really not just about that specific issue, I would like to know the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kay Kay updated LUCENE-1257:
Attachment: LUCENE-1257_contrib_benchmark.patch
Port to Java5
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768795#action_12768795
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2005:
--
bq. Michael, actually this issue was just to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768810#action_12768810
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
bq. Right... and I think we really shouldn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768815#action_12768815
]
Glen Newton commented on LUCENE-2005:
-
Yes, it was just concerned with adding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768827#action_12768827
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2003:
-
Umm - its hard to emulate the positions stuff
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768829#action_12768829
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2003:
-
Well no crap - MultiPhraseQuery already does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768829#action_12768829
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2003 at 10/22/09 7:40 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2003:
Attachment: LUCENE-2003.patch
Here is a patch showing essentially what I mean
Highlighter has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768838#action_12768838
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2002:
-
bq. OK I'll take that approach, and I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768840#action_12768840
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. We may want to see if it can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768845#action_12768845
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2002:
---
Eric Hatcher :-)
Maybe the search-replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1373.
Resolution: Duplicate
Dup of LUCENE-2002.
Most of the contributed Analyzers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768843#action_12768843
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2003:
--
Could you explain this part?
{code}
+
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768845#action_12768845
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2002 at 10/22/09 7:59 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768853#action_12768853
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2003:
-
Hmm - well now you have me worried - never seen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-2003:
Attachment: LUCENE-2003.patch
This should be more correct - add the largest inc to the slop if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kay Kay updated LUCENE-1257:
Attachment: LUCENE-1257_unnnecessary_casts_2.patch
Port to Java5
-
Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768862#action_12768862
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2003:
-
Okay - I think this is the way to go -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768863#action_12768863
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2003:
--
bq. You only need to add to the slop the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-2003:
--
Assignee: Mark Miller (was: Michael McCandless)
OK Mark you get this one :)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768866#action_12768866
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2003:
-
bq. The total would almost seem to tip the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768874#action_12768874
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
bq. Maybe the search-replace with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768878#action_12768878
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2002:
---
Cool. Did you check the minimum ANT version
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768889#action_12768889
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2002:
I think we are good: I just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2002:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2002-29.patch
New patch attached. All tests pass. Changes:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2002?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768907#action_12768907
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2002:
---
Looks good.
bq. I didn't add Version to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12768916#action_12768916
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1960:
---
I still prefer 1, but maybe it's not so
Hey Michael:
Would you mind rerunning the test you have with jdk1.5?
Also, if you would, change the comparator method to avoid brachning
for int and string comparators, e.g.
return index.order[i.doc] - index.order[j.doc];
Thanks
-John
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:38 AM,
Why? What might he find? Whats with the cryptic request?
Why would Java 1.5 perform better than 1.6? It erases 20 and 40% gains?
I know point 2 certainly doesn't. Cards on the table?
John Wang wrote:
Hey Michael:
Would you mind rerunning the test you have with jdk1.5?
Also,
Mark:
Please be patient with me. I am seeing a difference and was wondering
if Mike would see the same thing. I thought Michael would be willing to
because he expressed interest in understanding what the performance
discrepancies are.
Again, it is only a request. It is perfectly
Mark,
We're not seeing exactly the numbers that Mike is seeing in his tests,
running with jdk 1.5 on intel macs, so we're trying to eliminate factors of
difference.
Point 2 does indeed make a difference, we've seen it, and it's only fair:
the
single pq comparator does this branch
I am patient :) And I'm not speaking for Mike, I'm speaking for me. I'm
wondering what your seeing. Asking Mike to rerun the tests without
giving any further info (you didn't even say that your seeing something
different) is unfair to the rest of us ;)
Giving 0 info along with your request just
Thanks - thats all I'm asking for. A simple explanation of why you'd ask
for a retest with those two things changed. Just seems its hold your
cards a little to close to say - please do this with 0 explanation.
As to point 2, thats fine - I'm sure it helps - I was just saying I
didn't buy it helps
Mike:
I did just post with what I saw, feel free to read and comment on it.
I am simply trying to work with Michael on this and trying to
understand the code.
As I have expressed previously, I have seen a difference between 1.5
and 1.6 that is significant. Since Mike has
For some reason I guess this didn't go thru and caused all the confusion.
||Seg size||Query||Tot hits||Sort||Top N||QPS old||QPS new||Pct change||
|log|all|100|rand string|10|91.76|108.63|{color:green}18.4%{color}|
|log|all|100|rand string|25|92.39|106.79|{color:green}15.6%{color}|
I guess I should be more clear in the email.
No - If you mentioned before the other info and I missed it, just say:
Mark you don't know what your talking about it and you missed the info.
Thats what I'd do.
You just caught me at a time when I'm trying to get these tests going
myself, and a
Mark:
There is no reason for me to withhold information. I just want to
understand and share my findings.
My bad for not being clear.
Mike's test is actually very well written, I just followed
instructions in the jira and got it running. I think the tests has good
coverage
John Wang wrote:
Mark:
There is no reason for me to withhold information. I just want
to understand and share my findings.
Right, I didn't mean to accuse you of that ;) Not that you were doing it
on purpose. I was just trying to string out more :) Which I've managed
to do - in my usual
bq. I just followed instructions in the jira and got it running.
Heh - I didn't read down far enough - first comment says 2.9 branch.
Thanks ; ) I've been flipping through revisions for a while now,
wondering how the heck the revs in the patch match up with trunk.
John Wang wrote:
Mark:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 10:35 PM, John Wang john.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Please be patient with me. I am seeing a difference and was wondering
if Mike would see the same thing.
Some differences are bound to be seen... with your changes (JVM
changes, branch optimizations), are you seeing
It's hard to read the column format, but if you look up above in the thread
from tonight,
you can see that yes, for PQ sizes less than 100 elements, multiPQ is
better, and only
starts to be worse at around 100 for strings, and 50 for ints.
-jake
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769039#action_12769039
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Results from John Wang:
||Seg size||Query||Tot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769042#action_12769042
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Hah! Thanks for posting that, Mark! Much
Hi Yonik
I am, but I don't think I should. Even with branching etc., I should see
that much of a consistent difference.
I am traveling with my macbook pro, I wanted to eliminate all variables.
It really does not make sense to me...
-John
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:06 PM, Yonik Seeley
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769045#action_12769045
]
John Wang commented on LUCENE-1997:
---
My machine HW spec:
Model Name: MacBook Pro
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com wrote:
It's hard to read the column format, but if you look up above in the thread
from tonight,
you can see that yes, for PQ sizes less than 100 elements, multiPQ is
better, and only
starts to be worse at around 100 for
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Jake Mannix jake.man...@gmail.com
wrote:
It's hard to read the column format, but if you look up above in the
thread
from tonight,
you can see that yes, for PQ sizes less than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769051#action_12769051
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Another run:
I made the changes to int/string
he new API is much harder for the
average user to use, and even for the experienced user, it's not
terribly fun,
and more importantly:
Do we have enough info to support that though? All the cases I have seen
on the list, people have figured it out pretty easily - havn't really
seen any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769053#action_12769053
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1997:
--
While Java5 numbers are still important, I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769051#action_12769051
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1997 at 10/23/09 4:29 AM:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
he new API is much harder for the
average user to use, and even for the experienced user, it's not
terribly fun,
and more importantly:
Do we have enough info to support that though? All the cases I have seen
on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769055#action_12769055
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-1997 at 10/23/09 4:37 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769055#action_12769055
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Hey John, did you pull from a wiki dump or use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769056#action_12769056
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Java6 is standard in production servers, since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769058#action_12769058
]
Jake Mannix commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
I would say that of course weighting more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769059#action_12769059
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1997:
--
bq. Java6 is standard in production servers,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769060#action_12769060
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
Same system, Java 1.6.0_15
||Seg
Jake Mannix wrote:
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
he new API is much harder for the
average user to use, and even for the experienced user, it's not
terribly fun,
and more importantly:
Do we
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/987/changes
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes - I've seen a handful of non core devs report back that they
upgraded with no complaints on the difficulty. Its in the mailing list
archives. The only core dev I've seen say its easy is Uwe. He's super
sharp though,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769085#action_12769085
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
bq. Java6 is standard in production servers,
Hi Yonik:
I have been head deep in this trying to find out a good solution for
better part of the past two days, it's been hard because there are so many
variables:
1) how optimized are the code from either of the implementations
2) VM difference
3) HW etc.
Also, there are quite a few
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769088#action_12769088
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1997:
-
John, what happened to your topn:100 results?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12769089#action_12769089
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1997:
--
There was a bad stretch in Java6... they
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
