[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1370) Patch to make ShingleFilter output a unigram if no ngrams can be generated

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774216#action_12774216 ] Chris Harris commented on LUCENE-1370: -- At the risk of being annoying, is there any c

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2038) Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2038: -- Fix Version/s: 3.0 > Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4 > --

RE: Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1000

Fixed the problem. Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Apache Hudson Server [mailto:hud...@hudson.zones.apache.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 6:50 PM > To: java-dev@lucene.apach

Build failed in Hudson: Lucene-trunk #1000

See Changes: [simonw] LUCENE-2032: fixed serialization issue in CartesianShapeFilter and removed referenced to java 5 logging API [uschindler] Fix de-serialization of interned field names [uschindler] LUCENE-2032: Spatial Fi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2036) Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774187#action_12774187 ] Joey Surls commented on LUCENE-2036: This is unfortunate. The use case is the followi

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2038) Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2038: Attachment: LUCENE-2038.patch > Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4 > ---

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2038) Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4

Systemrequirements should say 1.5 instead of 1.4 Key: LUCENE-2038 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2038 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Task Components: Website

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774171#action_12774171 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313: -- Well, I added the background thread f

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer updated LUCENE-2034: Attachment: LUCENE-2034.patch I externalized the stopword related code into another base a

Re: Junit4

OK, done, see LUCENE-2037. This makes sense if for no other reason than not putting too many irons in the fire, especially non-critical ones. I don't see a way to assign it to myself, either I'm missing something or I'm just underprivileged , so if someone would go ahead and assign it to me I'll wo

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2037) Allow Junit4 tests in our environment.

Allow Junit4 tests in our environment. -- Key: LUCENE-2037 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Other Affects Vers

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2037) Allow Junit4 tests in our environment.

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Erick Erickson updated LUCENE-2037: --- Remaining Estimate: 8h (was: 24h) Original Estimate: 8h (was: 24h) > Allow Junit4 tes

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2036) Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-2036. - Resolution: Won't Fix > Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings >

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2036) Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774142#action_12774142 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2036: - This is a tricky one. The DistanceFilte

Re: Welcome Robert Muir as Lucene Java core committer!

Welcome Robert! Mike On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > I'm excited to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to promote Robert Muir > to Lucene Java core committer. > Robert was previously contrib committer and it has always been a pleasure to > work with him. > > Please joi

RE: Junit4

Hi Erick, We can switch to JUnit4 some time soon, but not before 3.0. 3.0 has no new features, only no deprecations anymore and Java 5 support + Generics. So all test stay almost the same (some minor tweaks because of deprecations). So we should release as soon as possible. After that we ca

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4

+1, Let's release it as soon as possible! After that I start to create the first 3.0 release artifacts (after some more tuning in trunk is done, but it is almost finished). Uwe - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Origina

Re: Welcome Robert Muir as Lucene Java core committer!

Congrats Robert. Maybe I'll see ya tomorrow? On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Michael Busch wrote: > I'm excited to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to promote Robert Muir > to Lucene Java core committer. > Robert was previously contrib committer and it has always been a pleasure to > work

RE: Welcome Robert Muir as Lucene Java core committer!

Gratulation!!! Let's start with the SuperFancyCNAnalyzer! :-) - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: u...@thetaphi.de > -Original Message- > From: Michael Busch [mailto:busch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 05, 2009 3:39 PM > To: ja

Re: Welcome Robert Muir as Lucene Java core committer!

Welcome :) On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Michael Busch wrote: > I'm excited to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to promote Robert Muir > to Lucene Java core committer. > Robert was previously contrib committer and it has always been a pleasure to > work with him. > > Please join me in w

Welcome Robert Muir as Lucene Java core committer!

I'm excited to announce that the Lucene PMC has voted to promote Robert Muir to Lucene Java core committer. Robert was previously contrib committer and it has always been a pleasure to work with him. Please join me in welcoming Robert aboard! Michael -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4

+1 -Yonik On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: > OK, again! > > I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 > branch), here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc4_lucene2.9.1/ > > Changes are here: > >  http://people.apache.org/~mike

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Lucene 2.9.1, take 4

+1 On Nov 3, 2009, at 2:05 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: OK, again! I've built new release artifacts from svn rev 832363 (on the 2.9 branch), here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc4_lucene2.9.1/ Changes are here: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/rc4_luce

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774098#action_12774098 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313: -- I turned on assert !sr.hasChanges in

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313: - Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch OK, all the tests pass consistently now. I guess the ne

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2036) Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2036?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Joey Surls updated LUCENE-2036: --- Attachment: LuceneSpatialTest.java JUnit test illustrating the problem > Underlying Spatial Logic d

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2036) Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings

Underlying Spatial Logic does not work in Remote Settings - Key: LUCENE-2036 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2036 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Comp

Re: Junit4

For most test classes it means just adding @Test before its 'public void' stuff. We can add more Junit4 stuff later, like timeouts, expected exceptions etc. It will also mean to stop extending TestCase and fix the (small number?) of tests which will be affected by it? And if we add static imports

Re: Junit4

I'm *not *advocating converting *any* tests just to incorporate Junit4. I'm advocating doing a minimal amount of work to be able to use either, as we find convenient. The only restriction would be that your particular test class would have to use one or the other (with the caveat that derived subcl

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774049#action_12774049 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1313: I'll try to have a look at this s

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1313) Near Realtime Search (using a built in RAMDirectory)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1313: - Attachment: LUCENE-1313.patch New assertions in NRT.flush are catching the issue that's

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774032#action_12774032 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2034: - I would be happy to get a better name f

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2034) Massive Code Duplication in Contrib Analyzers - unifly the analyzer ctors

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12774029#action_12774029 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2034: --- Even in core it will be a separate class, b

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-2032) Spatial Filters not Serializable

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2032?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simon Willnauer closed LUCENE-2032. --- Resolution: Fixed commited in revision 833122 > Spatial Filters not Serializable >

RE: Junit4

We will release Lucene 3.0 very short after 2.9.1, which will be released in a few days. Lucene 3.0 is already almost finished (only some small Java 5 refactorings like varargs), but there is currently no need to rewrite the tests for 3.0. JUnit is working perfectly at the moment, in my opinion the