[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830642#action_12830642 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2252: - bq. In modern machines (at least with the machi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830641#action_12830641 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-2252: --- bq. I still think 4 bytes/doc is too much (its too

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830632#action_12830632 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2252: - bq. as stated earlier, assuming we are not stor

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830628#action_12830628 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-2252: --- Sorry, I meant LUCENE-1914 > stored field retrieve

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830627#action_12830627 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-2252: --- bq. I do not understand, I think the fdx index is t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830615#action_12830615 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2252: - bq. Robert, we can get away with 4 bytes per do

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830603#action_12830603 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2252: -- The thing about stored fields is that it's no

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830599#action_12830599 ] John Wang commented on LUCENE-2252: --- Thanks Uwe for the pointer. Will check that out! R

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830582#action_12830582 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2252: --- FileSwitchDirectory comes into my mind. Jus

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830564#action_12830564 ] Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2252: - John, couldnt you simply write your own Directo

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2252) stored field retrieve slow

stored field retrieve slow -- Key: LUCENE-2252 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2252 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement Components: Store Affects Versions: 3.0 Re

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830550#action_12830550 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2248: - bq. Simon, if you like you can use it a

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2248: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2248.patch Patch with updated constant name. Simon, if you like you can us

[jira] Assigned: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler reassigned LUCENE-2248: - Assignee: Uwe Schindler > Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in ba

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830547#action_12830547 ] Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2248: --- Simon: I opened a sub-issue for contrib and

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-2251) Change contrib tests to use the special LuceneTestCase(J4) constant for the current version used a matchVersion parameter

Change contrib tests to use the special LuceneTestCase(J4) constant for the current version used a matchVersion parameter - Key: LUCENE-2251 UR

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12830543#action_12830543 ] Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2248: - Patch looks good uwe, I think we should

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-2248) Tests using Version.LUCENE_CURRENT will produce problems in backwards branch, when development for 3.2 starts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2248: -- Attachment: LUCENE-2248.patch Here my first patch. Please tell me which name for the static co